Literature DB >> 14665886

Randomized trial of lidocaine vs lidocaine/bupivacaine periprostatic injection on longitudinal pain scores after prostate biopsy.

C E Lee-Elliott1, D Dundas, U Patel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Periprostatic lidocaine reduces immediate post-prostate biopsy pain but still many men will not consent to re-biopsy. We performed a randomized study to assess whether adding long acting local anesthesia to a short acting agent would further reduce pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 300 men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy were sequentially randomized to receive either short acting local lidocaine (lid) or short and long acting lidocaine and bupivacaine (lid/bup). A 7-day questionnaire was used to study daily pain (10-point visual analog score), bleeding (hematuria, PR bleeding, hematospermia), visits to the family doctor and analgesic use, and whether they would agree to future re-biopsy.
RESULTS: Of the 256 questionnaires returned 250 were suitable for analysis. Cross-sectional comparison showed no intergroup differences in mean pain scores immediately after biopsy (2.24, 95% CI 1.94-2.5 vs 2.61, 95% CI 2.3-2.9, p = 0.88 in lid and lid/bup groups, respectively). There was a significant rebound in visual analog scale at 1 hour in the lid group but not in the lid/bup group (+ 0.9 vs + 0.09, p = 0.0006). Longitudinal analysis showed the global pain experience after lid/bup was better compared to lidocaine alone, with significantly less pain every subsequent day (p = 0.0006 to 0.002). No difference was seen in morbidity, analgesia usage or number refusing future re-biopsy (9.6% vs 9.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: Long and short acting local anesthetics together significantly attenuate the 1-hour rebound increase in pain scores seen after short acting anesthesia alone. Improved pain scores were sustained during the subsequent week and we advocate routine combination use for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14665886     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000098688.12631.a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

Review 1.  The technique of ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Imre Romics
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Comparison of the Effect of Lidocaine versus a Lidocaine-Bupivacaine Combination in a Periprostatic Nerve Block Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ali H Yilmaz; Elif Ziypak; Tevfik Ziypak; Mehmet Aksoy; Senol Adanur; Hüseyin Kocakgol; Saban O Demirdogen; Ozkan Polat
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2016-09-20

3.  Safety and detailed patterns of morbidity of transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of prostate in a urologist-led unit.

Authors:  George Lee; Kakahama Attar; Marc Laniado; Omer Karim
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Comparison of lornoxicam versus tramadol analgesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Gonul Olmez; Sedat Kaya; Ugur Aflay; Hayrettin Sahin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of prostate cancer for the radiologist.

Authors:  Richard Clements
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Onset and duration of intradermal mixtures of bupivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine.

Authors:  James B Collins; Juhee Song; Raman C Mahabir
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

7.  Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer.

Authors:  C J Harvey; J Pilcher; J Richenberg; U Patel; F Frauscher
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and the role of periprostatic nerve block: what radiologists should know.

Authors:  Babar Nazir
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.