A L Zietman1, C S Chung, J J Coen, W U Shipley. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard medical School, Boston, USA. azeitman@partners.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: We determine the efficacy of conventional dose, external beam radiation for localized prostate cancer using cohort analysis with maximized followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 205 men with T1-2 prostate cancer were treated with conventional external beam radiation to a median and modal dose of 68.4 Gy during a 16-month period from 1991 to 1993. Followup was maximized in these patients, and median followup for those alive with or without disease was 114 months. RESULTS: Median patient age at treatment was 72 years, and overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 78% and 53%, respectively. The actuarial risk of local failure was 18% at 10 years as was the risk of metastatic disease. The actuarial risk of being free of biochemical failure at 10 years (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition) was 49%. That risk was 42% if the definition was used without backdating failure to a time between last low value and first increase. When a crude analysis of 10-year outcome was performed 127 of the 205 treated patients (62%) were still alive, including 59% with no evidence of biochemical failure and a median prostate specific antigen of 1.0 ng/ml. Of the 78 men (38% of total) who died during the 10 years 32 died either of or with recurrent cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Mature followup minimizes many of the biases seen in previously published radiation series. This study provides a yardstick against which newer radiation modalities may be measured.
PURPOSE: We determine the efficacy of conventional dose, external beam radiation for localized prostate cancer using cohort analysis with maximized followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 205 men with T1-2prostate cancer were treated with conventional external beam radiation to a median and modal dose of 68.4 Gy during a 16-month period from 1991 to 1993. Followup was maximized in these patients, and median followup for those alive with or without disease was 114 months. RESULTS: Median patient age at treatment was 72 years, and overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 78% and 53%, respectively. The actuarial risk of local failure was 18% at 10 years as was the risk of metastatic disease. The actuarial risk of being free of biochemical failure at 10 years (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition) was 49%. That risk was 42% if the definition was used without backdating failure to a time between last low value and first increase. When a crude analysis of 10-year outcome was performed 127 of the 205 treated patients (62%) were still alive, including 59% with no evidence of biochemical failure and a median prostate specific antigen of 1.0 ng/ml. Of the 78 men (38% of total) who died during the 10 years 32 died either of or with recurrent cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Mature followup minimizes many of the biases seen in previously published radiation series. This study provides a yardstick against which newer radiation modalities may be measured.
Authors: Min Zhang; John J Coen; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Michael R Siedow; Andrzej Niemierko; Li-Yan Khor; Alan Pollack; Yifen Zhang; Anthony L Zietman; William U Shipley; Arnab Chakravarti Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: George Rodrigues; Padraig Warde; Tom Pickles; Juanita Crook; Michael Brundage; Luis Souhami; Himu Lukka Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Anthony L Zietman; Kyounghwa Bae; Jerry D Slater; William U Shipley; Jason A Efstathiou; John J Coen; David A Bush; Margie Lunt; Daphna Y Spiegel; Rafi Skowronski; B Rodney Jabola; Carl J Rossi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ryan S Brame; Marco Zaider; Kristen L Zakian; Jason A Koutcher; Amita Shukla-Dave; Victor E Reuter; Michael J Zelefsky; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: V Y Zhang; A Westphalen; L Delos Santos; Z L Tabatabai; K Shinohara; D B Vigneron; J Kurhanewicz Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 4.044