Literature DB >> 14665851

Endoscopic features of impacted ureteral stones.

Soichi Mugiya1, Toshiki Ito, Satoshi Maruyama, Shinsuke Hadano, Hiroshi Nagae.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We retrospectively evaluated endoscopic findings in 165 patients with impacted ureteral stones to determine the incidence of associated ureteral lesions and predisposing factors for such lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1993 to March 2003 we performed retrograde endoscopic treatment in 165 patients with ureteral stones that had been impacted for more than 2 months. Average maximum stone diameter was 15.0 mm and the mean duration of impaction was 17.6 months. Treatment was done with small caliber ureteroscopes and a laser lithotriptor. We analyzed the endoscopic findings and determined the outcome by reviewing the clinical records and radiographic studies.
RESULTS: Endoscopic observation revealed inflammatory ureteral polyps associated with calculi in 51 patients (30.9%). Endoscopic biopsy of 5 polyps was performed. Histological examination showed no malignancy and only chronic granulomatous inflammation of the ureter. Endoscopic observation also detected ureteral stricture in 28 patients (17.0%). Patients with polyps and strictures had long-term impaction (median 12 and 24 months, respectively), which was significantly longer than in patients without ureteral lesions (4 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic observation revealed that long-term impacted stones were frequently associated with ureteral polyps and strictures. Although concurrent ureteral lesions can make it more difficult to approach the calculus in patients with impacted stones, we found that a small caliber flexible endoscope was effective and laser fragmentation could be achieved easily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14665851     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100960.08768.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

1.  Ureteral stricture formation after ureteroscope treatment of impacted calculi: a prospective study.

Authors:  Xeng Inn Fam; Praveen Singam; Christopher Chee Kong Ho; Radhika Sridharan; Rozita Hod; Badrulhisham Bahadzor; Eng Hong Goh; Guan Hee Tan; Zulkifli Zainuddin
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-06

2.  Ureteral wall thickness at the impacted ureteral stone site: a critical predictor for success rates after SWL.

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Alper Kafkasli; Özgür Yazici; Ali Cihangir Çetinel; Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol; Murat Tuncer; Cahit Şahin; Bilal Eryildirim
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Impaction of ureteral stones into the ureteral wall: Is it possible to predict?

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Bilal Eryildirim; Cahit Sahin; Kubilay Sabuncu; Cihangir Cetinel; Fehmi Narter
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mostafa Khalil
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-04

5.  A comparison of antegrade percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones.

Authors:  Hikmet Topaloglu; Nihat Karakoyunlu; Sercan Sari; Hakki Ugur Ozok; Levent Sagnak; Hamit Ersoy
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Characteristics and outcomes of ureteroscopic treatment in 2650 patients with impacted ureteral stones.

Authors:  Jaap D Legemate; Nienke J Wijnstok; Tadashi Matsuda; Willem Strijbos; Tibet Erdogru; Beat Roth; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Judith Palacios-Ramos; Roberto M Scarpa; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone.

Authors:  Ki Don Chang; Joo Yong Lee; Sung Yoon Park; Dong Hyuk Kang; Hyung Ho Lee; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; Bing Zhong; Xiaosong Yang; Gongcheng Wang; Peijin Hou; Junsong Meng
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Large impacted upper ureteral calculi: A comparative study between retrograde ureterolithotripsy and percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy in the modified lateral position.

Authors:  Kamal Moufid; Najib Abbaka; Driss Touiti; Latifa Adermouch; Mohamed Amine; Mohammed Lezrek
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-07

10.  Radiological noninvasive assessment of ureteral stone impaction into the ureteric wall: A critical evaluation with objective radiological parameters.

Authors:  Ozlem Elibol; Kadihan Yalcin Safak; Ayse Buz; Bilal Eryildirim; Kutluhan Erdem; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.