Literature DB >> 14665842

Factors related to delayed graft function after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Sidney C Abreu1, David A Goldfarb, Ithaar Derweesh, Julie Thornton, Jean L Urbain, Edward Mascha, Andrew P Steinberg, Jihad H Kaouk, Stuart Flechner, Charles Modlin, Venkatesh Krishnamurthi, Andrew C Novick, Inderbir S Gill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Delayed graft function after live donor transplantation affects 5% to 10% of recipients regardless of procurement technique. This delay in function is associated with an increased risk of rejection and decreased graft survival. In the present study we critically assess allograft recovery to identify the risk factors related to delayed graft function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed donor and recipient medical records from 100 consecutive laparoscopic live donor nephrectomies from August 1997 to October 2001. Four criteria were used to classify delayed graft function: I) requirement of dialysis in postoperative week 1, II) creatinine 2.5 mg/dl or greater at postoperative day 5, III) time to half peak activity (mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan) at postoperative day 5 greater than 12.2 minutes (normal range 1 to 12.2) and IV) time to peak activity (mercaptoacetyltriglycine renal scan) at day 5 greater than 6.5 minutes (normal range 2.1 to 6.5). Patients could qualify for multiple outcome categories. Patients who did not match any of these criteria were classified as having normal renal function (outcome 0).
RESULTS: The number of patients in the delayed graft function categories were 5 with outcome I, 14 with outcome II, 39 with outcome III and 24 with outcome IV. There were 23 patients represented in more than 1 category and 59 patients were classified as having normal function. Recipient age, donor/recipient gender relationship, unrelated highly mismatched donors and cold/total preservation time were identified as risk factors related to impaired early renal function recovery. None of the variables related to the laparoscopic technique itself represented risk factors for delayed graft function.
CONCLUSIONS: Female donor kidneys into male recipients and highly HLA mismatched donors represent factors that may be controlled by donor selection when feasible. All attempts should be made to decrease cold ischemia time and, therefore, total preservation time. Prolonged carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, warm ischemia time, renal artery length or use of right kidney did not adversely affect the functional outcome of the allografts procured laparoscopically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14665842     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000098819.79442.ce

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Pure versus hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 1508 transplants from two centers.

Authors:  Hiroshi Noguchi; Yoichi Kakuta; Masayoshi Okumi; Kazuya Omoto; Yasuhiro Okabe; Hideki Ishida; Masafumi Nakamura; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Nox2 is a mediator of ischemia reperfusion injury.

Authors:  A S Karim; S R Reese; N A Wilson; L M Jacobson; W Zhong; A Djamali
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  The mini-incision donor nephrectomy is best suited for Indian patients undergoing live donor nephrectomy: against the motion.

Authors:  Pranjal Modi
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

4.  Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: outcomes analysis of 266 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Charles J Dolce; Jennifer E Keller; K Christian Walters; Daniel Griffin; H James Norton; B Todd Heniford; Kent W Kercher
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; Pamposh Raina; Anant Kumar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 6.  Staplers or clips?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vessel controlling devices for renal pedicle ligation in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Zhongli Huang; Yuntian Chen; Banghua Liao; Deyi Luo; Xiaoshuai Gao; Kunjie Wang; Hong Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Anuar Ibrahim Mitre; Francisco T Dénes; William Carlos Nahas; Fabiano A Simões; José Roberto Colombo; Affonso C Piovesan; José L Chambô; Sami Arap; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Is Euro-Collins better than ringer lactate in live related donor renal transplantation?

Authors:  G Siva Prasad; Chacko N Ninan; Antony Devasia; Lionel Gnanaraj; Nitin S Kekre; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07

9.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Current status.

Authors:  A Srivastava; N Gupta; Anant Kumar; Rakesh Kapoor; Deepak Dubey
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.