OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of a brief neuropsychological bedside screening battery to discriminate between Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, and semantic dementia. METHODS: Subjects were 21 patients with frontotemporal dementia, 14 patients with semantic dementia, and 30 patients with Alzheimer disease comparable in terms of Mini Mental Status Examination score, age, and education. Frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia diagnoses were made clinically using the consensus criteria of Neary et al. 1 Subjects were administered a brief neuropsychological screening assessing episodic memory, working memory, executive function, naming, spatial ability, abstract reasoning, and calculations. RESULTS: Both the Alzheimer disease and semantic dementia groups were significantly impaired relative to the frontotemporal dementia group on verbal memory, whereas only the Alzheimer disease group was impaired on visual memory. Frontotemporal dementia patients performed significantly worse on backward digit span and made significantly more executive errors than Alzheimer disease and semantic dementia patients. Semantic dementia patients were more impaired than Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal dementia patients on confrontation naming. Discriminant function analyses identified the 5 most discriminating variables that correctly classified 89.2% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and Alzheimer disease are associated with distinct neuropsychological profiles that classify these dementia syndromes with considerable success. The neuropsychological profiles highlight the distinctiveness between the 3 syndromes, are consistent with the known loci of neuropathology in these conditions, and can potentially serve as an adjunct to the current clinical criteria.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of a brief neuropsychological bedside screening battery to discriminate between Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, and semantic dementia. METHODS: Subjects were 21 patients with frontotemporal dementia, 14 patients with semantic dementia, and 30 patients with Alzheimer disease comparable in terms of Mini Mental Status Examination score, age, and education. Frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia diagnoses were made clinically using the consensus criteria of Neary et al. 1 Subjects were administered a brief neuropsychological screening assessing episodic memory, working memory, executive function, naming, spatial ability, abstract reasoning, and calculations. RESULTS: Both the Alzheimer disease and semantic dementia groups were significantly impaired relative to the frontotemporal dementia group on verbal memory, whereas only the Alzheimer disease group was impaired on visual memory. Frontotemporal dementiapatients performed significantly worse on backward digit span and made significantly more executive errors than Alzheimer disease and semantic dementiapatients. Semantic dementiapatients were more impaired than Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal dementiapatients on confrontation naming. Discriminant function analyses identified the 5 most discriminating variables that correctly classified 89.2% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and Alzheimer disease are associated with distinct neuropsychological profiles that classify these dementia syndromes with considerable success. The neuropsychological profiles highlight the distinctiveness between the 3 syndromes, are consistent with the known loci of neuropathology in these conditions, and can potentially serve as an adjunct to the current clinical criteria.
Authors: Judy Pa; Katherine L Possin; Stephen M Wilson; Lovingly C Quitania; Joel H Kramer; Adam L Boxer; Michael W Weiner; Julene K Johnson Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Virginia E Sturm; Megan E McCarthy; Ira Yun; Anita Madan; Joyce W Yuan; Sarah R Holley; Elizabeth A Ascher; Adam L Boxer; Bruce L Miller; Robert W Levenson Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Maya L Henry; Stephen M Wilson; Miranda C Babiak; Maria Luisa Mandelli; Pelagie M Beeson; Zachary A Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Kelly A Gola; Avril Thorne; Lisa D Veldhuisen; Cordula M Felix; Sarah Hankinson; Julie Pham; Tal Shany-Ur; Guido P Schauer; Christine M Stanley; Shenly Glenn; Bruce L Miller; Katherine P Rankin Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Teresa Q Wu; Zachary A Miller; Babu Adhimoolam; Diana D Zackey; Baber K Khan; Robin Ketelle; Katherine P Rankin; Bruce L Miller Journal: Neurocase Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 0.881
Authors: Keith A Vossel; Kamalini G Ranasinghe; Alexander J Beagle; Danielle Mizuiri; Susanne M Honma; Anne F Dowling; Sonja M Darwish; Victoria Van Berlo; Deborah E Barnes; Mary Mantle; Anna M Karydas; Giovanni Coppola; Erik D Roberson; Bruce L Miller; Paul A Garcia; Heidi E Kirsch; Lennart Mucke; Srikantan S Nagarajan Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: James R Bateman; Christopher M Filley; Rini I Kaplan; Kate S Heffernan; Brianne M Bettcher Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 2.475