Literature DB >> 14665553

Strong ions, weak acids and base excess: a simplified Fencl-Stewart approach to clinical acid-base disorders.

D A Story1, H Morimatsu, R Bellomo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Fencl-Stewart approach to acid-base disorders uses five equations of varying complexity to estimate the base excess effects of the important components: the strong ion difference (sodium and chloride), the total weak acid concentration (albumin) and unmeasured ions. Although this approach is straightforward, most people would need a calculator to use the equations. We proposed four simpler equations that require only mental arithmetic and tested the hypothesis that these simpler equations would have good agreement with more complex Fencl-Stewart equations.
METHODS: We reduced two complex equations for the sodium-chloride effect on base excess to one simple equation: sodium-chloride effect (meq litre(-1))=[Na(+)]-[Cl(-)]-38. We simplified the equation of the albumin effect on base excess to an equation with two constants: albumin effect (meq litre(-1))=0.25x(42-[albumin]g litre(-1)). Using 300 blood samples from critically ill patients, we examined the agreement between the more complex Fencl-Stewart equations and our simplified versions with Bland-Altman analyses.
RESULTS: The estimates of the sodium-chloride effect on base excess agreed well, with no bias and limits of agreement of -0.5 to 0.5 meq litre(-1). The albumin effect estimates required log transformation. The simplified estimate was, on average, 90% of the Fencl-Stewart estimate. The limits of agreement for this percentage were 82-98%.
CONCLUSIONS: The simplified equations agree well with the previous, more complex equations. Our findings suggest a useful, simple way to use the Fencl-Stewart approach to analyse acid-base disorders in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14665553     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeh018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  22 in total

Review 1.  [Infusion therapy for neonates, infants and children].

Authors:  M A Steurer; T M Berger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Stewart's acid-base approach].

Authors:  Georg-Christian Funk
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Hyponatremia in spinal cord injury patients: new insight into differentiating between the dilution and depletion forms.

Authors:  J Kriz; O Schuck; M Horackova
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  The use of chloride-sodium ratio in the evaluation of metabolic acidosis in critically ill neonates.

Authors:  Abdullah Kurt; Ayşe Ecevit; Servet Ozkiraz; Deniz Anuk Ince; Abdullah Baris Akcan; Aylin Tarcan
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  A head to head evaluation of 8 biochemical scanning tools for unmeasured ions.

Authors:  Thomas J Morgan; Chris M Anstey; Matthew B Wolf
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  [Interpretation of acid-base disorders].

Authors:  Mathis Hochrainer; Georg-Christian Funk
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Comparison of a new simplified acid-base tool to the original Stewart-Figge approach: a study on cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Michalis Agrafiotis; Dimitrios Mpliamplias; Maria Papathanassiou; Fotini Ampatzidou; Georgios Drossos
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 8.  [The Stewart model. "Modern" approach to the interpretation of the acid-base metabolism].

Authors:  M Rehm; P F Conzen; K Peter; U Finsterer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Extreme metabolic alkalosis in intensive care.

Authors:  Swagata Tripathy
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-10

Review 10.  Nutrients and micronutrients at risk during renal replacement therapy: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mette M Berger; Marcus Broman; Lui Forni; Marlies Ostermann; Elisabeth De Waele; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.