Literature DB >> 14665354

A randomized double-blind prospective study evaluating patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate using prebiopsy rofecoxib.

Alireza Moinzadeh1, Arthur Mourtzinos, Veronica Triaca, Karim J Hamawy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of a prebiopsy outpatient analgesia using the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent rofecoxib (Vioxx). Urologists perform approximately 500,000 transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies of the prostate per year, commonly without analgesia. Recent reports, however, have determined that a significant proportion of patients undergoing TRUS-guided biopsies have pain.
METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized double-blind study of 56 men referred for TRUS biopsy of the prostate. They were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg of oral rofecoxib or placebo before TRUS biopsy. After the biopsies, the patients were asked to score the severity of pain by filling out a visual analog pain scale. At the end of 1 week, all patients were asked to mail in a questionnaire regarding the morbidity of the prostate biopsy, including dysuria, hematuria, urinary retention, postbiopsy fever, and rectal bleeding. Analysis was completed to assess whether rofecoxib decreased the patients' perception of pain. The postbiopsy morbidity of patients receiving placebo versus rofecoxib was compared.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of patients receiving placebo and 42% of patients receiving rofecoxib had significant pain (5 or greater on the visual analog pain scale). The median pain score of patients receiving rofecoxib (4.0) versus placebo (4.0) was not significantly different statistically (P = 0.3139) using a Wilcoxon rank sum analysis. The incidence of postbiopsy morbidity was not different.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the findings of previous studies demonstrating that a significant proportion of patients undergoing prostate biopsies have pain. More importantly, we found that prebiopsy rofecoxib did not significantly decrease the patients' severity of discomfort. Finally, the morbidity after biopsy was not increased with the use of rofecoxib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14665354     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00788-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of two different doses of lidocaine on the pain sensation during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Ferhat Ateş; Furkan Dursun; Ercan Malkoç; Ömer Yılmaz; Hasan Soydan; Hüseyin Şen; Şeref Başal; Fatih Zekey; Kenan Karademir
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-09

2.  Efficacy and safety of three different analgesic methods for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  X Ouzounidis; K Moysidis; N Kalinderis; D Papanikolaou; P Koukourikis; E Papaefstathiou; K Hatzimouratidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Comparison of lornoxicam versus tramadol analgesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Gonul Olmez; Sedat Kaya; Ugur Aflay; Hayrettin Sahin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Comparative Evaluation of Periprostatic Nerve Block with and without Intraprostatic Nerve Block in Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostatic Needle Biopsy.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar Singh; Ashok Kumar; Mahavir Singh Griwan; Jyotsna Sen
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-08-16

5.  Efficacy of Periprostatic Anesthesia according to Lidocaine Dose during Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy of the Prostate.

Authors:  Kyung Seok Kang; Jeong Kyun Yeo; Min Gu Park; Dae Yeon Cho; Sang Hyun Park; Seok San Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-11-14

Review 6.  Pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and the role of periprostatic nerve block: what radiologists should know.

Authors:  Babar Nazir
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.