Literature DB >> 14664679

Meta-analysis of raw mean differences.

Charles F Bond1, Wyndy L Wiitala, F Dan Richard.   

Abstract

This article discusses the meta-analysis of raw mean differences. It presents a rationale for cumulating psychological effects in a raw metric and compares raw mean differences to standardized mean differences. Some limitations of standardization are noted, and statistical techniques for raw meta-analysis are described. These include a graphical device for decomposing effect sizes. Several illustrative data sets are analyzed.

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 14664679     DOI： 10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN： 1082-989X


  9 in total

1.  Variability in the Results of Meta-Analysis as a Function of Comparing Effect Sizes Based on Scores From Noncomparable Measures: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  William R Nugent
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Methodological assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on COVID-19: A meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Kristine J Rosenberger; Chang Xu; Lifeng Lin
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.336

3.  Student evaluations of teaching: teaching quantitative courses can be hazardous to one's career.

Authors:  Bob Uttl; Dylan Smibert
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Computing Multivariate Effect Sizes and Their Sampling Covariance Matrices With Structural Equation Modeling: Theory, Examples, and Computer Simulations.

Authors:  Mike W-L Cheung
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-17

5.  Heterogeneity of Research Results: A New Perspective From Which to Assess and Promote Progress in Psychological Science.

Authors:  Audrey Helen Linden; Johannes Hönekopp
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-01-05

6.  Are older adults more risky readers? Evidence from meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiaqi Zhang; Kayleigh L Warrington; Lin Li; Ascensión Pagán; Kevin B Paterson; Sarah J White; Victoria A McGowan
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2022-01-31

7.  Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Irving Kirsch; Brett J Deacon; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Alan Scoboria; Thomas J Moore; Blair T Johnson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  The efficacy of paroxetine and placebo in treating anxiety and depression: a meta-analysis of change on the Hamilton Rating Scales.

Authors:  Michael A Sugarman; Amy M Loree; Boris B Baltes; Emily R Grekin; Irving Kirsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chasing Animals With Split Attention: Are Animals Prioritized in Visual Tracking?

Authors:  Thomas Hagen; Thomas Espeseth; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-09-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.