Literature DB >> 14664677

Estimating the validity of the guilty knowledge test from simulated experiments: the external validity of mock crime studies.

David Carmel1, Eran Dayan, Ayelet Naveh, Ori Raveh, Gershon Ben-Shakhar.   

Abstract

This experiment was designed to examine the external validity of the standard mock-crime procedure used extensively to evaluate the validity of polygraph tests. The authors manipulated the type of mock-crime procedure (standard vs. a more realistic version) and the time of test (immediate vs. delayed) and examined their effects on the validity of the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) and the recall rate of the relevant items. The results indicated that only the type of mock-crime affected the 2 outcome variables. The realistic procedure was associated with a lower recall rate and weaker detection efficiency than the standard procedure. However, these effects were mediated by the type of GKT questions used. Practical implications of these results are discussed. ((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14664677     DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.9.4.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  20 in total

Review 1.  Applications of neuroscience in criminal law: legal and methodological issues.

Authors:  John B Meixner
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Bio-behavioral synchrony is a potential mechanism for mate selection in humans.

Authors:  Lior Zeevi; Nathalie Klein Selle; Eva Ludmilla Kellmann; Gal Boiman; Yuval Hart; Shir Atzil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Current research and potential applications of the concealed information test: an overview.

Authors:  Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-12

4.  When interference helps: increasing executive load to facilitate deception detection in the concealed information test.

Authors:  George Visu-Petra; Mihai Varga; Mircea Miclea; Laura Visu-Petra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-28

5.  The current and future status of the concealed information test for field use.

Authors:  Izumi Matsuda; Hiroshi Nittono; John J B Allen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-27

6.  P300 amplitudes in the concealed information test are less affected by depth of processing than electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Stefan Berti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Time and encoding effects in the concealed knowledge test.

Authors:  Travis L Seymour; Becky R Fraynt
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2009-06-18

8.  Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: a review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walczyk; Frank P Igou; Alexa P Dixon; Talar Tcholakian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-01

9.  When Pinocchio's nose does not grow: belief regarding lie-detectability modulates production of deception.

Authors:  Kamila E Sip; David Carmel; Jennifer L Marchant; Jian Li; Predrag Petrovic; Andreas Roepstorff; William B McGregor; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Combining blink, pupil, and response time measures in a concealed knowledge test.

Authors:  Travis L Seymour; Christopher A Baker; Joshua T Gaunt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.