Literature DB >> 14664673

Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments.

Martin J Farrell1, Paul Arnold, Steve Pettifer, Jessica Adams, Tom Graham, Michael MacManamon.   

Abstract

The authors investigated the extent to which route learning in a virtual environment (VE) transfers to the real world. In Experiment 1, active VE exploration, on its own or with a map, produced better transfer of training than either no VE training at all or passive VE training; however, transfer was achieved after shorter training times with the map. Experiment 2 demonstrated that VE + map training was not superior to training with a map alone, and Experiment 3 demonstrated that the poorer performances observed after passive VE training were not simply due to a lack of attention but to the lack of active navigational decisions. The authors concluded that the present VE technology does not provide better route learning than studying a map. ((c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved)

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14664673     DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.9.4.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  12 in total

Review 1.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil; William H Warren
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  Active route learning in virtual environments: disentangling movement control from intention, instruction specificity, and navigation control.

Authors:  Rul von Stülpnagel; Melanie C Steffens
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-26

3.  Does active learning benefit spatial memory during navigation with restricted peripheral field?

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge.

Authors:  Roy A Ruddle; Ekaterina Volkova; Betty Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

5.  Learning building layouts with non-geometric visual information: the effects of visual impairment and age.

Authors:  Amy A Kalia; Gordon E Legge; Nicholas A Giudice
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Detecting navigational deficits in cognitive aging and Alzheimer disease using virtual reality.

Authors:  Laura A Cushman; Karen Stein; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Human and machine learning in non-Markovian decision making.

Authors:  Aaron Michael Clarke; Johannes Friedrich; Elisa M Tartaglia; Silvia Marchesotti; Walter Senn; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Age-related wayfinding differences in real large-scale environments: detrimental motor control effects during spatial learning are mediated by executive decline?

Authors:  Mathieu Taillade; Hélène Sauzéon; Prashant Arvind Pala; Marie Déjos; Florian Larrue; Christian Gross; Bernard N'Kaoua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Virtual environments for the transfer of navigation skills in the blind: a comparison of directed instruction vs. video game based learning approaches.

Authors:  Erin C Connors; Elizabeth R Chrastil; Jaime Sánchez; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Sex Differences in Using Spatial and Verbal Abilities Influence Route Learning Performance in a Virtual Environment: A Comparison of 6- to 12-Year Old Boys and Girls.

Authors:  Edward C Merrill; Yingying Yang; Beverly Roskos; Sara Steele
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.