Literature DB >> 14664533

Comparison of static headspace, headspace solid phase microextraction, headspace sorptive extraction, and direct thermal desorption techniques on chemical composition of French olive oils.

Jean-François Cavalli1, Xavier Fernandez, Louisette Lizzani-Cuvelier, André-Michel Loiseau.   

Abstract

Static headspace (SHS), headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME), headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE), and direct thermal desorption (DTD) were applied to the analysis of four French virgin olive oils from Corsica. More than 60 compounds were isolated and characterized by GC-RI and GC-MS. SHS was not suited to the characterization of olive oil volatile compounds because of low sensitivity. The SPME and HSSE techniques were successfully applied to olive oil headspace analysis. Both methods allow the characterization of volatile compounds (mainly C(6) aldehydes and alcohols), which contribute significantly to the "green" flavor note of virgin olive oils. The PDMS stir bar showed a higher concentration capacity than a DVB/CAR/PDMS SPME fiber due to the higher volume of polymeric coating. DTD was a very good tool for extracting volatile and especially semivolatile compounds, such as sesquiterpenes, but requires a significant investment like that for HSSE. Finally, SPME may be a more appropriate technique for routine quality control due to its operational simplicity, repeatability, and low cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14664533     DOI: 10.1021/jf034834n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  9 in total

1.  Production of isotopically labeled standards from a uniformly labeled precursor for quantitative volatile metabolomic studies.

Authors:  Pilar Gómez-Cortés; J Thomas Brenna; Gavin L Sacks
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Protocol for solid-phase microextraction method development.

Authors:  Sanja Risticevic; Heather Lord; Tadeusz Górecki; Catherine L Arthur; Janusz Pawliszyn
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Comparative analysis of the volatile fraction of fruit juice from different Citrus species.

Authors:  M Carmen González-Mas; José Luis Rambla; M Carmen Alamar; Abelardo Gutiérrez; Antonio Granell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A comparison of sample preparation methods for extracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from equine faeces using HS-SPME.

Authors:  Rachael Hough; Debra Archer; Christopher Probert
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.290

5.  Determination of the effects of different high-temperature treatments on texture and aroma characteristics in Alaska pollock surimi.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Yaozhou Zhu; Shi Chen; Changhua Xu; Yan Yu; Xichang Wang; Wenzheng Shi
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  Towards the Identification of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Causing Urinary Tract Infections Using Volatile Organic Compounds Analysis-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Keith Hewett; Natalia Drabińska; Paul White; Matthew B Avison; Raj Persad; Norman Ratcliffe; Ben de Lacy Costello
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11

7.  Comparing Three Different Extraction Techniques on Essential Oil Profiles of Cultivated and Wild Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) Flower.

Authors:  Chun-Yun Zhang; Mingquan Guo
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16

8.  Changes in Volatile Compound Profiles in Cold-Pressed Oils Obtained from Various Seeds during Accelerated Storage.

Authors:  Anna Gaca; Eliška Kludská; Jaromír Hradecký; Jana Hajšlová; Henryk H Jeleń
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Evaluation of the microencapsulation of orange essential oil in biopolymers by using a spray-drying process.

Authors:  Maria Clara Santana Aguiar; Maria Fátima das Graças Fernandes da Silva; João Batista Fernandes; Moacir Rossi Forim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.