Literature DB >> 1466432

Anaesthesia for myocardial revascularisation. A comparison of fentanyl/propofol with fentanyl/enflurane.

S M Underwood1, S W Davies, R O Feneck, R K Walesby.   

Abstract

We studied the effects on myocardial performance and metabolism of fentanyl/propofol and fentanyl/enflurane anaesthesia in 20 patients before coronary artery bypass grafting. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl 20 micrograms.kg-1 and pancuronium 0.15 mg.kg-1. Patients received, by random allocation, either propofol by infusion, 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 reduced by half after 10 min then adjusted as necessary (mean rate 2.8 mg.kg-1.h-1), or enflurane 0.8% inspired concentration for 10 min reduced to 0.6% and adjusted as required (mean 0.7%). Measurements were made before induction, after tracheal intubation, after skin incision and after sternotomy. There were no significant differences between the groups in any haemodynamic variables during the study. Following intubation both groups showed a rise in heart rate (p < 0.01) and cardiac index (p < 0.05). Systemic vascular resistance decreased after intubation (p < 0.05) then returned to baseline during surgery; stroke index was unchanged after intubation but was reduced during surgery (p < 0.01) as systemic vascular resistance increased. Regional and global coronary blood flow were maintained in both groups, as were myocardial oxygen consumption and lactate extraction ratio. However, lactate production did occur in one patient receiving enflurane and Holter monitoring confirmed ischaemia. One patient receiving propofol showed lactate production not accompanied by any ECG changes. This study suggests that propofol may be a suitable alternative to enflurane as an adjunct to opioids in anaesthesia for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1466432     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb03194.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  3 in total

1.  Propofol sequestration within the extracorporeal circuit.

Authors:  M Hynynen; E Hammarén; P H Rosenberg
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Comparison of the effects of desflurane and propofol anesthesia on the inflammatory response and s100β protein during coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Elif Doğan Baki; Mustafa Aldemir; Serdar Kokulu; Halit Buğra Koca; Yüksel Ela; Remziye Gül Sıvacı; Nilgün Kavrut Öztürk; Mustafa Emmiler; Fahri Adalı; Hanife Uzel
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 3.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.