Literature DB >> 14663813

The effects of articaine hydrochloride on wound healing: an experimental study.

Necdet Doğan1, Cahit Uçok, Cem Korkmaz, Ozlem Uçok, Hakan Alpay Karasu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to examine the effect of articaine hydrochloride (AH) on the healing of surgical wounds and to compare healing with that of lidocaine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty rats were used in this study. The rats were randomly separated into 4 groups. Three groups were given 2% lidocaine, 4% AH, or injectable saline, and the fourth was a control group. Skin specimens underwent the breaking strength test (BST) and histologic examination at 1 week after the surgical procedure. The skin specimens of the rats were subjected to a pulling force of 10 mm/min across the incision line. The strength value at the moment of breaking in the tissue was expressed in Newtons. Histologic examination was performed as well, and wound healing was graded.
RESULTS: Both the histologic grade and BST values in the lidocaine and AH groups were significantly lower than those of the control and saline groups (P <.01). Similarly, the histologic and BST values of the AH and lidocaine groups were statistically significant (P <.05, P <.001). Some necrotic regions were observed at the incision region in 2 samples from the AH group.
CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed that AH is as safe a local anesthetic agent as lidocaine from the standpoint of wound response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14663813     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Influence of Pain and Analgesia on Orthopedic and Wound-healing Models in Rats and Mice.

Authors:  Monika K Huss; Stephen A Felt; Cholawat Pacharinsak
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  An experimental study on the comparison of the effects of triester glycerol oxide on wound repair.

Authors:  Serhat Sezgin; Metin Sencimen; Aydin Gülses; Fevzi Erdemci; Mustafa Ayna; İsmail K Gider; Onder Ongoru; Tuncer Cayci
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-06-21

3.  Clinically relevant doses of lidocaine and bupivacaine do not impair cutaneous wound healing in mice.

Authors:  A Waite; S C Gilliver; G R Masterson; M J Hardman; G S Ashcroft
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.

Authors:  Deepashri H Kambalimath; R S Dolas; H V Kambalimath; S M Agrawal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-04-05

5.  A comparative evaluation of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: A clinical study.

Authors:  Sunith Maruthingal; Dennis Mohan; Ramesh Kumar Maroli; Ali Alahmari; Ahmed Alqahtani; Mohammed Alsadoon
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  Wound Healing Problems in the Mouth.

Authors:  Constantinus Politis; Joseph Schoenaers; Reinhilde Jacobs; Jimoh O Agbaje
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Articaine: a review of its use for local and regional anesthesia.

Authors:  Marc Snoeck
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2012-06-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.