Literature DB >> 14663473

Transrectal periprostatic lidocaine injection anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective study.

H Ozveri1, I Cevik, O Dillioglugil, A Akdaş.   

Abstract

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy remains the mainstay of the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Although this diagnostic method is a safe procedure and well tolerated by most patients a significant number of patients report discomfort and pain during prostate biopsy. In order to define the best method of anesthesia, many studies, in which different methods were compared, have been performed. To determine the effectiveness of local injection anesthesia in TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, we designed and performed this prospective study in order to evaluate the utility of periprostatic nerve block for pain management. A total of 100 patients who had elevated total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) were included in this study. Half of the patients received periprostatic injection anesthesia (group I) and the remaining half received placebo (group II). Patients received 10 cm3 (5 cm3 each side) 1% lidocaine injected into the periprostatic nerve plexus under transrectal ultrasonic guidance. Pain during biopsy was assessed using a 10-point modified visual analog scale (VAS). In groups I and II, mean patient age was 66.8+2.5 and 65.6+11.5 y, mean tPSA was 7.87+/-3.6 and 11.3+/-1.7 ng/ml, mean biopsy duration was 6.5+/-2.5 and 6.6+/-2.2 min and mean pain score during TRUS-guided biopsy was 1.46+/-2.2 and 4.5+/-2.1, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed with respect to age, tPSA and mean biopsy duration between these groups. Mean pain VAS score was statistically or significantly better (P=0.0001) in the lidocaine injection group (group I), and furthermore no patient had a VAS pain score > or =5 in this group. Only minor and transient complications occurred in both groups. This study reinforces the usage of periprostatic nerve block as a standard method of pain management during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, because it is simple, safe, uncostly and significantly effective without requiring additional time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14663473     DOI: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  4 in total

1.  Size of the transrectal ultrasound probe makes no difference in pain perception during TRUS-Bx under adequate local anesthesia.

Authors:  Sefik Koprulu; Ibrahim Cevik; Nuri Unlu; Ozdal Dillioglugil
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  A 50-50% mixture of nitrous oxide-oxygen in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A randomized and prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Gabriel da Silva Cazarim; Nubia Verçosa; Leonel Carneiro; Rachel Pastor; Elizabeth Fernandes Vaz da Silva; Louis Barrucand; Ismar Lima Cavalcanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Effectiveness of periprostatic block to prevent pain in transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo; Natalia Guzman Mejia; Lizeth Fernandez; Jorge Carbonell
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-04-08

4.  Pain control according to the periprostatic nerve block site in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Jeong Woo Yoo; Kyo Chul Koo; Byung Ha Chung; Kwang Suk Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.