Literature DB >> 14662247

Simplified scoring system for predicting mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Mansoor A Qureshi1, Robert D Safian, Cindy L Grines, James A Goldstein, Douglas C Westveer, Susan Glazier, Mamtha Balasubramanian, William W O'Neill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop a simplified scoring system based on pre-intervention clinical characteristics to predict in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with variety of complications, including the risk of death. Factors leading to poor outcomes need to be identified. Currently available indexes are cumbersome and therefore seldom used.
METHODS: Crude mortality and univariate odds ratios (ORs) for mortality associated with multiple clinical characteristics were calculated for 9,954 patients undergoing PCI at the William Beaumont Hospital during 1996 to 1998. Based on the OR, each factor was assigned a weighted score. Using these scores, a classification was constructed to determine the probability of death after PCI, with classes I through IV representing an increasing probability of procedural mortality. This classification was validated in a separate group of patients.
RESULTS: The factors with the highest univariate odds of dying and their scores were: myocardial infarction <14 days = 7; elevated creatinine = 4; multivessel disease = 4; and age >65 years = 3. Classes were created based on the presence of these factors in a given patient. The odds of dying and mortality increased significantly with each class. These results were reproduced in the validation subset.
CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedural clinical risk factors have a differential influence on the probability of death after PCI. Risk classification based on these factors can be used to accurately predict the procedural outcome. This simple classification can be used by interventionalists to assist in management decisions, to provide an estimate of procedural risk to the patients and relatives, and for quality assurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14662247     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  9 in total

1.  Risk scoring for percutaneous coronary intervention: let's do it!

Authors:  A Siotia; J Gunn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Comparison of six risk scores in patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease undergoing PCI: competing factors influence mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.

Authors:  Jason C Kovacic; Atul M Limaye; Samantha Sartori; Paul Lee; Roshan Patel; Sweta Chandela; Biana Trost; Swathi Roy; Rafael Harari; Birju Narechania; Rucha Karajgikar; Michael C Kim; Prakash Krishnan; Pedro Moreno; Usman Baber; Roxana Mehran; George Dangas; Annapoorna S Kini; Samin K Sharma
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Risk stratification for long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Chuntao Wu; Fabian T Camacho; Spencer B King; Gary Walford; David R Holmes; Nicholas J Stamato; Peter B Berger; Samin Sharma; Jeptha P Curtis; Ferdinand J Venditti; Alice K Jacobs; Edward L Hannan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  Comorbid conditions and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  M Singh; C S Rihal; V L Roger; R J Lennon; J Spertus; A Jahangir; D R Holmes
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  A Risk-Scoring Model to Predict One-year Major Adverse Cardiac Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Seyed-Ebrahim Kassaian; Sepideh Saroukhani; Farshid Alaeddini; Mojtaba Salarifar; Davide Capodanno; Hamidreza Poorhoseini; Masoumeh Lotfi-Tokaldany; Massoud A Leesar; Hassan Aghajani; Elham Hakki-Kazzazi; Mohammad Alidoosti; Ali-Mohammad Haji-Zeinali; Maryam Saifi; Ebrahim Nematipour
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2015-10-27

6.  Impact of coronary artery calcification on percutaneous coronary intervention and postprocedural complications.

Authors:  Rami M Abazid; M Obadah Kattea; Osama A Smettei; Yasir Beshir; Haitham Sakr
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-05-17

7.  Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention in one-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Hossein Farshidi; Ahmadnoor Abdi; Abdulhussain Madani; Shahram Moshiri; Abolfazl Ghasemi; Ruhollah Hakimian
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2018-02-25

8.  Vascular complications in patients who underwent endovascular cardiac procedures: multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Angelita Costanzi Paganin; Mariur Gomes Beghetto; Maria Karolina Feijó; Roselene Matte; Jaquelini Messer Sauer; Eneida Rejane Rabelo-Silva
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-10-11

9.  Generalizability of Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Prediction Models: 158 Independent External Validations of 104 Unique Models.

Authors:  Gaurav Gulati; Jenica Upshaw; Benjamin S Wessler; Riley J Brazil; Jason Nelson; David van Klaveren; Christine M Lundquist; Jinny G Park; Hannah McGinnes; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ben Van Calster; David M Kent
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2022-03-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.