Literature DB >> 1466209

Therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS)--a method for measuring workload and calculating costs in the ICU.

J Mälstam1, L Lind.   

Abstract

The Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS) is an easily applicable method for measurement of workload in the intensive care unit (ICU). In the present study a modified TISS-scoring (mTISS) was performed daily during 1988-1989 on 2693 patients in a general ICU. Of these, 900 could be classified as 'true' ICU-patients (ICU-stay > or = 24 h or TISS > or = 20 points), whereas the rest were postoperative. In ICU-patients the average length of stay was 4.5 +/- 8.9 days and the average workload 114 +/- 218 mTISS-points. The workload was not significantly related to age or type of admission (scheduled vs unscheduled). Hospital non-survivors (13.6%) showed a significantly increased mean total mTISS-score (239 +/- 364, P < 0.001). Critically ill (TISS Class IV) patients (14% of the sample), with an average workload of 437 +/- 401 mTISS-points, consumed 53% of the total resources. Patients categorized (ICD-9) to respiratory and infectious diseases showed the greatest average workload (207 +/- 315 and 208 +/- 355 mTISS-points, respectively). A workload-index was also developed relating the actual workload to the ICU personnel. The cost of each mTISS-point was calculated. In conclusion, the present study showed that mTISS is a valuable tool when evaluating resource utilization in the ICU. Together with the proposed workload-index and calculation of costs, mTISS could be used for ICU management control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1466209     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1992.tb03559.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  8 in total

1.  A model to compute the medical cost of patients in intensive care.

Authors:  C Chaix; I Durand-Zaleski; C Alberti; C Brun-Buisson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Intensive care performance: How should we monitor performance in the future?

Authors:  Tim K Timmers; Michiel Hj Verhofstad; Karl Gm Moons; Luke Ph Leenen
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11-04

3.  Automatic calculation of the nine equivalents of nursing manpower use score (NEMS) using a patient data management system.

Authors:  Axel Junger; Florian Brenck; Bernd Hartmann; Joachim Klasen; Lorenzo Quinzio; Matthias Benson; Achim Michel; Rainer Röhrig; Gunter Hempelmann
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Estimation of direct cost and resource allocation in intensive care: correlation with Omega system.

Authors:  M Sznajder; G Leleu; G Buonamico; B Auvert; P Aegerter; Y Merlière; M Dutheil; B Guidet; J R Le Gall
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study.

Authors:  Elisa Estenssoro; Rosa Reina; Héctor S Canales; María Gabriela Saenz; Francisco E Gonzalez; María M Aprea; Enrique Laffaire; Victor Gola; Arnaldo Dubin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Sepsis-related organ failure assessment and withholding or withdrawing life support from critically ill patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Investigating the cognitive capacity constraints of an ICU care team using a systems engineering approach.

Authors:  Jaeyoung Park; Xiang Zhong; Yue Dong; Amelia Barwise; Brian W Pickering
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  A German national prevalence study on the cost of intensive care: an evaluation from 51 intensive care units.

Authors:  Onnen Moerer; Enno Plock; Uchenna Mgbor; Alexandra Schmid; Heinz Schneider; Manfred Bernd Wischnewsky; Hilmar Burchardi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.