Literature DB >> 14661027

Unraveling protein interaction networks with near-optimal efficiency.

Michael Lappe1, Liisa Holm.   

Abstract

The functional characterization of genes and their gene products is the main challenge of the genomic era. Examining interaction information for every gene product is a direct way to assemble the jigsaw puzzle of proteins into a functional map. Here we demonstrate a method in which the information gained from pull-down experiments, in which single proteins act as baits to detect interactions with other proteins, is maximized by using a network-based strategy to select the baits. Because of the scale-free distribution of protein interaction networks, we were able to obtain fast coverage by focusing on highly connected nodes (hubs) first. Unfortunately, locating hubs requires prior global information about the network one is trying to unravel. Here, we present an optimized 'pay-as-you-go' strategy that identifies highly connected nodes using only local information that is collected as successive pull-down experiments are performed. Using this strategy, we estimate that 90% of the human interactome can be covered by 10,000 pull-down experiments, with 50% of the interactions confirmed by reciprocal pull-down experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14661027     DOI: 10.1038/nbt921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  19 in total

Review 1.  Complex networks and simple models in biology.

Authors:  Eric de Silva; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Co-evolutionary analysis of domains in interacting proteins reveals insights into domain-domain interactions mediating protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Raja Jothi; Praveen F Cherukuri; Asba Tasneem; Teresa M Przytycka
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Optimal stepwise experimental design for pairwise functional interaction studies.

Authors:  Fergal P Casey; Gerard Cagney; Nevan J Krogan; Denis C Shields
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  The challenges of informatics in synthetic biology: from biomolecular networks to artificial organisms.

Authors:  Gil Alterovitz; Taro Muso; Marco F Ramoni
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 5.  Embryonic stem cell interactomics: the beginning of a long road to biological function.

Authors:  Maram Yousefi; Vahid Hajihoseini; Woojin Jung; Batol Hosseinpour; Hassan Rassouli; Bonghee Lee; Hossein Baharvand; KiYoung Lee; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  Estimating the size of the human interactome.

Authors:  Michael P H Stumpf; Thomas Thorne; Eric de Silva; Ronald Stewart; Hyeong Jun An; Michael Lappe; Carsten Wiuf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Coverage and error models of protein-protein interaction data by directed graph analysis.

Authors:  Tony Chiang; Denise Scholtens; Deepayan Sarkar; Robert Gentleman; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Evidence of highly regulated genes (in-Hubs) in gene networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jesper Lundström; Johan Björkegren; Jesper Tegnér
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-07-14

9.  Cost-effective strategies for completing the interactome.

Authors:  Ariel S Schwartz; Jingkai Yu; Kyle R Gardenour; Russell L Finley; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Multiple imputations applied to the DREAM3 phosphoproteomics challenge: a winning strategy.

Authors:  Nicolas Guex; Eugenia Migliavacca; Ioannis Xenarios
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.