Literature DB >> 14660995

Universal health insurance coverage does not eliminate inequities in access to cardiac procedures after acute myocardial infarction.

Louise Pilote1, Lawrence Joseph, Patrick Bélisle, John Penrod.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether socioeconomic status (SES) influences access to invasive cardiac procedures after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a universal health care system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of SES on access to cardiac procedure after AMI in a universal health care system.
METHODS: This was an observational cohort study of all patients with a first AMI in the province of Quebec, Canada, between 1985 to 1995. Information on treatment was obtained from the discharge and physicians' claims databases. SES was obtained from census data by linking postal codes. SES-independent predictors of use were identified, then incorporated in hierarchical models to predict use in low, medium, and high SES areas. The main outcome measures were rates of cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) as a function of SES.
RESULTS: SES data were available for 62,364 individuals with a first AMI. Of these, 65% were men and the mean age was 64 +/- 13 years. Rates of cardiac procedures rose with an increase in several SES measures. After adjustment for individual-level predictors of use of cardiac catheterization, average rent, (odds ratio per $100 difference: 1.57, 95% credible interval: 1.36 to 1.80) and proportion of renters, (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.21 to 3.73) in the area were independent SES predictors. Patients in low SES areas (median family income: $ 30,809 CDN) were less likely to undergo cardiac catheterization than patients in high SES areas ($92,169 CDN) (men: 33%; compared with 47%; women: 18%; compared with 47%). However, among patients with cardiac catheterization, SES was not associated with the use of revascularization procedures. For example, PCI rates for men within 90 days after AMI were 26%, compared with 25% in low and high SES areas, respectively. CABG rates were 15%, compared with 19%.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that in the universal health care system of Canada, access to cardiac catheterization after AMI varied according to SES. Among those with cardiac catheterization, SES did not appear to influence further use of revascularization procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14660995     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00448-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  29 in total

1.  Diffusion of new medication across different income groups under a universal health insurance program: an example involving newly enlisted nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for elderly osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  Pen-Jen Wang; Yiing-Jenq Chou; Cheng-Hua Lee; Christy Pu
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Unequal access to interventional cardiac care in Nova Scotia in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  J Mayich; Jafna L Cox; Karen J Buth; Jean-Francois Légaré
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Associations of area based deprivation status and individual educational attainment with incidence, treatment, and prognosis of first coronary event in Rome, Italy.

Authors:  Sally Picciotto; Francesco Forastiere; Massimo Stafoggia; Daniela D'Ippoliti; Carla Ancona; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Socioeconomic status and incidence of sudden cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Kyndaron Reinier; Elizabeth Thomas; Douglas L Andrusiek; Tom P Aufderheide; Steven C Brooks; Clifton W Callaway; Paul E Pepe; Thomas D Rea; Robert H Schmicker; Christian Vaillancourt; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Neighborhood socioeconomic and racial disparities in angiography and coronary revascularization: the ARIC surveillance study.

Authors:  Kathryn M Rose; Randi E Foraker; Gerardo Heiss; Wayne D Rosamond; Chirayath M Suchindran; Eric A Whitsel
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Assessing the risk of waiting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery among patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery.

Authors:  Jean-François Légaré; Alex MacLean; Karen J Buth; John A Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Consultation with cardiologists for persons with new-onset chronic heart failure: a population-based study.

Authors:  Debbie Ehrmann Feldman; Yongling Xiao; Sasha Bernatsky; Jeannie Haggerty; Karen Leffondré; Pierre Tousignant; Yves Roy; Michael Abrahamowicz
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Risk-taking attitudes and their association with process and outcomes of cardiac care: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kathryn M King; Colleen M Norris; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  The impact of statins on health services utilization and mortality in older adults discharged from hospital with ischemic heart disease: a cohort study.

Authors:  Charmaine A Cooke; Susan A Kirkland; Ingrid S Sketris; Jafna Cox
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Universal health care no guarantee of equity: comparison of socioeconomic inequalities in the receipt of coronary procedures in patients with acute myocardial infarction and angina.

Authors:  Rosemary J Korda; Mark S Clements; Chris W Kelman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.