Literature DB >> 14660777

Hand rolling cigarette papers as the reference point for regulating cigarette fire safety.

M Laugesen1, M Duncanson, T Fraser, V McClellan, B Linehan, R Shirley.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the burning characteristics of the tobacco and paper of manufactured and hand rolled cigarettes, and set a fire safety standard of manufacture to largely reduce the fire risk from discarded cigarettes.
METHODS: (1) Cigarette extinction test of ignition strength: 40 cigarettes per brand, lit and placed on 15 layers of filter paper, in accordance with ASTM test standard E2187-02. (2) Citrate extracted by 0.1N hydrochloric acid from cigarette papers and from tobacco in manufactured cigarettes, the supernatant analysed by high performance liquid chromatography using ultraviolet visual light spectrophotometer. (3) Survey of 750 nationally representative adults age 18 years and over, by telephone, including 184 smokers. MATERIALS: (a) New Zealand made Holiday, and Horizon, and US made Marlboro manufactured cigarettes; (b) US manufactured Merit with banded paper; (c) Holiday, Horizon and Marlboro hand rolling tobaccos, hand rolled in Rizla cigarette papers; (d) manufactured cigarettes as in (a), reconstructed using Rizla hand rolling cigarette papers.
RESULTS: 1. (a) For each brand of manufactured cigarettes, 40/40 burnt full length; (b) for Merit banded paper cigarettes 29/40 (73%) burnt full length; (c) for each brand of hand rolled cigarettes 0/40 burnt full length; (d) 0/40 manufactured cigarettes reconstructed with Rizla hand rolling paper burnt full length. 2. Citrate content: (a) In manufactured cigarette papers: 0.3-0.8 mg; in tobacco of manufactured cigarettes: Holiday 0, Horizon 0, Marlboro 8.8 mg; (b) Merit: in banded paper 0.418 mg; in tobacco 10.23 mg; (c) In hand rolled cigarettes: in the papers < 0.08 mg; in hand rolled tobacco 13.3-15.0 mg; (d) In hand rolling papers of reconstructed cigarettes: < 0.018 mg. 3. Requiring manufactured cigarettes to compulsorily self-extinguish when left unattended was supported by 67% of smokers, 61% of manufactured cigarette smokers, 82% of hand rolled smokers, and by 68% of non-smokers.
CONCLUSION: The wrapping paper is a key determinant of whether or not unpuffed cigarettes burn their full length. Using international test methods, popular brands of manufactured cigarettes all burnt full length, but none did so when re-wrapped in hand rolling cigarette paper. This provides a ready-to-hand smoker acceptable standard for reducing ignition potential from manufactured cigarettes, as a basis for regulation or litigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14660777      PMCID: PMC1747792          DOI: 10.1136/tc.12.4.406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  8 in total

1.  Research priorities for injury prevention.

Authors:  I Roberts
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 2.  Cost-outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: eighty-four recent estimates for the United States.

Authors:  T R Miller; D T Levy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  The case for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documents.

Authors:  M Gunja; G Ferris Wayne; A Landman; G Connolly; A McGuire
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Fire injuries, disasters, and costs from cigarettes and cigarette lights: a global overview.

Authors:  B N Leistikow; D C Martin; C E Milano
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Deaths and injuries from house fires.

Authors:  G R Istre; M A McCoy; L Osborn; J J Barnard; A Bolton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Fire fatalities in elderly people.

Authors:  A T Elder; T Squires; A Busuttil
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Fatal residential fires: who dies and who survives?

Authors:  S W Marshall; C W Runyan; S I Bangdiwala; M A Linzer; J J Sacks; J D Butts
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Risk factors for fatal residential fires.

Authors:  C W Runyan; S I Bangdiwala; M A Linzer; J J Sacks; J Butts
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Marlboro UltraSmooth: a potentially reduced exposure cigarette?

Authors:  Murray Laugesen; Jefferson Fowles
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Recent Advances in Cigarette Ignition Propensity Research and Development.

Authors:  Hillel R Alpert; Richard J O'Connor; Ron Spalletta; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Fire Technol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.239

3.  Hand-rolled cigarette smoking patterns compared with factory-made cigarette smoking in New Zealand men.

Authors:  Murray Laugesen; Michael Epton; Chris M A Frampton; Marewa Glover; Rod A Lea
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.