Literature DB >> 14660185

When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: toward a dual-process model of language.

Diana Van Lancker Sidtis1.   

Abstract

Although interest in the language sciences was previously focused on newly created sentences, more recently much attention has turned to the importance of formulaic expressions in normal and disordered communication. Also referred to as formulaic expressions and made up of speech formulas, idioms, expletives, serial and memorized speech, slang, sayings, clichés, and conventional expressions, non-propositional language forms a large proportion of every speaker's competence, and may be differentially disturbed in neurological disorders. This review aims to examine non-propositional speech with respect to linguistic descriptions, psycholinguistic experiments, sociolinguistic studies, child language development, clinical language disorders, and neurological studies. Evidence from numerous sources reveals differentiated and specialized roles for novel and formulaic verbal functions, and suggests that generation of novel sentences and management of prefabricated expressions represent two legitimate and separable processes in language behaviour. A preliminary model of language behaviour that encompasses unitary and compositional properties and their integration in everyday language use is proposed. Integration and synchronizing of two disparate processes in language behaviour, formulaic and novel, characterizes normal communicative function and contributes to creativity in language. This dichotomy is supported by studies arising from other disciplines in neurology and psychology. Further studies are necessary to determine in what ways the various categories of formulaic expressions are related, and how these categories are processed by the brain. Better understanding of how non-propositional categories of speech are stored and processed in the brain can lead to better informed treatment strategies in language disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14660185     DOI: 10.1080/13682820310001601080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord        ISSN: 1368-2822            Impact factor:   3.020


  10 in total

1.  Dramatic effects of speech task on motor and linguistic planning in severely dysfluent parkinsonian speech.

Authors:  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis; Krista Cameron; John J Sidtis
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  The role of subcortical structures in recited speech: Studies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Kelly A Bridges; Diana Van Lancker Sidtis; John J Sidtis
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.710

3.  Formulaic Language in Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease: Complementary Effects of Subcortical and Cortical Dysfunction.

Authors:  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis; JiHee Choi; Amy Alken; John J Sidtis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The formulaic schema in the minds of two generations of native speakers.

Authors:  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis; Krista Cameron; Kelly Bridges; John J Sidtis
Journal:  Ampersand (Oxford)       Date:  2015

5.  Effects of neurological damage on production of formulaic language.

Authors:  Diana Sidtis; Gina Canterucci; Dora Katsnelson
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Formulaic Language in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Kelly Ann Bridges; Diana Van Lancker Sidtis
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.773

7.  Similarities and Differences Between Native and Non-native Speakers' Processing of Formulaic Sequences: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study.

Authors:  Licui Zhao; Daichi Yasunaga; Haruyuki Kojima
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-04

8.  Facing the music: three issues in current research on singing and aphasia.

Authors:  Benjamin Stahl; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-23

9.  How to engage the right brain hemisphere in aphasics without even singing: evidence for two paths of speech recovery.

Authors:  Benjamin Stahl; Ilona Henseler; Robert Turner; Stefan Geyer; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  An Electrophysiological Abstractness Effect for Metaphorical Meaning Making.

Authors:  Bálint Forgács
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-09-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.