Literature DB >> 14659599

Reliability of the Cardiff Test of basic life support and automated external defibrillation version 3.1.

Richard H Whitfield1, Robert G Newcombe, Malcolm Woollard.   

Abstract

The introduction of the European Resuscitation Guidelines (2000) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillation (AED) prompted the development of an up-to-date and reliable method of assessing the quality of performance of CPR in combination with the use of an AED. The Cardiff Test of basic life support (BLS) and AED version 3.1 was developed to meet this need and uses standardised checklists to retrospectively evaluate performance from analyses of video recordings and data drawn from a laptop computer attached to a training manikin. This paper reports the inter- and intra-observer reliability of this test. Data used to assess reliability were obtained from an investigation of CPR and AED skill acquisition in a lay responder AED training programme. Six observers were recruited to evaluate performance in 33 data sets, repeating their evaluation after a minimum interval of 3 weeks. More than 70% of the 42 variables considered in this study had a kappa score of 0.70 or above for inter-observer reliability or were drawn from computer data and therefore not subject to evaluator variability. 85% of the 42 variables had kappa scores for intra-observer reliability of 0.70 or above or were drawn from computer data. The standard deviations for inter- and intra-observer measures of time to first shock were 11.6 and 7.7 s, respectively. The inter- and intra-observer reliability for the majority of the variables in the Cardiff Test of BLS and AED version 3.1 is satisfactory. However, reliability is less acceptable with respect to shaking when checking for responsiveness, initial check/clearing of the airway, checks for signs of circulation, time to first shock and performance of interventions in the correct sequence. Further research is required to determine if modifications to the method of assessing these variables can increase reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14659599     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00246-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  19 in total

1.  [Test to measure basic life support and defibrillation skills in primary care doctors and nurses].

Authors:  Bartomeu Casabella Abril; David Lacasta Tintorer; Thais Clusa Gironella; Aina Perelló Bratescu; M A Dolores García Ortega; Antoni Albiach Pla; Salomé Larrea Tárrega
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Easy-to-learn cardiopulmonary resuscitation training programme: a randomised controlled trial on laypeople's resuscitation performance.

Authors:  Rachel Jia Min Ko; Swee Han Lim; Vivien Xi Wu; Tak Yam Leong; Sok Ying Liaw
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Effects of introducing a voluntary virtual patient module to a basic life support with an automated external defibrillator course: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Andrzej A Kononowicz; Paweł Krawczyk; Grzegorz Cebula; Marta Dembkowska; Edyta Drab; Bartosz Frączek; Aleksandra J Stachoń; Janusz Andres
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Occupational affiliation does not influence practical skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Södersved Källestedt; Anders Berglund; Ann-Britt Thoren; Johan Herlitz; Mats Enlund
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  A comparative study of defibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance during simulated cardiac arrest in nursing student teams.

Authors:  Sissel I Eikeland Husebø; Conrad A Bjørshol; Hans Rystedt; Febe Friberg; Eldar Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  The effectiveness of a 'train the trainer' model of resuscitation education for rural peripheral hospital doctors in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Bishan N Rajapakse; Teresa Neeman; Andrew H Dawson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mixed methods feasibility study for the surviving opioid overdose with naloxone education and resuscitation (SOONER) trial.

Authors:  Aaron M Orkin; Mercy Charles; Kristine Norris; Rekha Thomas; Leigh Chapman; Amy Wright; Douglas M Campbell; Curtis Handford; Michelle Klaiman; Shaun Hopkins; Rita Shahin; Kevin Thorpe; Peter Jüni; Janet Parsons; Kate Sellen; Nick Goso; Richard Hunt; Pamela Leece; Laurie J Morrison; Vicky Stergiopoulos; Suzanne Turner; Carol Strike
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-05-14

8.  Basic life support and automated external defibrillator skills among ambulance personnel: a manikin study performed in a rural low-volume ambulance setting.

Authors:  Anne Møller Nielsen; Dan Lou Isbye; Freddy Knudsen Lippert; Lars Simon Rasmussen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Can video mobile phones improve CPR quality when used for dispatcher assistance during simulated cardiac arrest?

Authors:  S R Bolle; J Scholl; M Gilbert
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Moritz Mahling; Alexander Münch; Sebastian Schenk; Stephan Volkert; Andreas Rein; Uwe Teichner; Pascal Piontek; Leopold Haffner; Daniel Heine; Andreas Manger; Jörg Reutershan; Peter Rosenberger; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Stephan Zipfel; Nora Celebi
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.