Literature DB >> 14659383

Oncology professionals' communication with cancer patients about complementary therapy: a survey.

D M Hann1, F Baker, M M Denniston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the communication practices of three groups of oncology professionals with regard to discussion of complementary therapies with cancer patients.
DESIGN: A mail survey was completed by a randomly selected, nationwide sample of oncology physicians, oncology nurses, and oncology social workers in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents indicated how often they initiated discussion of complementary therapies, their comfort level discussing this subject, and the perceived impact on the patient-professional relationship.
RESULTS: Significantly more of the social workers reported that they initiated discussion of complementary therapy compared to physicians and nurses. Physicians and social workers reported being equally comfortable with this topic and more so than nurses. More of the social workers reported believing that discussing complementary therapies can enhance the patient-professional relationship.
CONCLUSIONS: Oncology social workers were more amenable to discussing complementary therapies than physicians or nurses. The impact of communication on patient outcomes is addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14659383     DOI: 10.1016/s0965-2299(03)00091-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  6 in total

1.  Information to cancer patients: ready for new challenges?

Authors:  Antonella Surbone
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Is a biopsychosocial-spiritual approach relevant to cancer treatment? A study of patients and oncology staff members on issues of complementary medicine and spirituality.

Authors:  Eran Ben-Arye; Gil Bar-Sela; Moshe Frenkel; Abraham Kuten; Doron Hermoni
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Integrative Oncology Scholars Program: A Model for Integrative Oncology Education.

Authors:  Suzanna Maria Zick; Christina Czuhajewski; Judith M Fouladbakhsh; Heather Greenlee; Richard Edmund Harris; Norah Lynn Henry; Shruti Jolly; Tohfa Khabir; Jane Perlmutter; Tami Remington; Detrick Snyder; Lisa Spratke; Brad Zebrack; Erin Zettell; Rita Benn
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.579

4.  Bridging the gap: decision-making processes of women with breast cancer using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).

Authors:  Lynda G Balneaves; Tracy L O Truant; Mary Kelly; Marja J Verhoef; B Joyce Davison
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Addressing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Individuals With Cancer: An Integrative Review and Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lynda G Balneaves; Cody Z Watling; Emilie N Hayward; Brenda Ross; Jill Taylor-Brown; Antony Porcino; Tracy L O Truant
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Knowledge about complementary, alternative and integrative medicine (CAM) among registered health care providers in Swedish surgical care: a national survey among university hospitals.

Authors:  Kristofer Bjerså; Elisabet Stener Victorin; Monika Fagevik Olsén
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.659

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.