Literature DB >> 14659312

The contribution of work-up or additional views to the accuracy of diagnostic mammography.

N Houssami1, L Irwig, J M Simpson, M McKessar, S Blome, J Noakes.   

Abstract

This study examines the influence of work-up on the accuracy of diagnostic mammography in symptomatic women. Subjects were sampled from all women consecutively attending a symptomatic breast clinic and aged 25-55 years (240 women shown to have breast cancer and 240 age-matched women shown not to have cancer). Mammography films were prospectively reported by two radiologists independently of each other and in a blinded manner using two phases of film reading: initially only baseline films were read, then mammography was re-read with work-up films. The accuracy of reporting mammography with and without work-up was compared using sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Reporting the mammogram with work-up (compared to without any work-up films) improved sensitivity (75.3% vs 69.0%, P=0.059) for one radiologist, with a non-significant gain in specificity (84.5% vs 79.4%, P=0.38). For the other radiologist, it resulted in a non-significant decrease in sensitivity (79.5% vs 83.7%, P=0.14) with a significant increase in specificity (85.6% vs 61.9%, P=0.00001). ROC curves for both radiologists showed that reporting mammography with work-up resulted in significant improvement (4.5% for R1, 6.8% for R2) in overall test accuracy. Our findings support the use of work-up mammography in the diagnostic setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14659312     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00098-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  4 in total

1.  Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practice.

Authors:  Sebastien Haneuse; Diana S M Buist; Diana L Miglioretti; Melissa L Anderson; Patricia A Carney; Tracy Onega; Berta M Geller; Karla Kerlikowske; Robert D Rosenberg; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore; Stephen H Taplin; Robert A Smith; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Linn Abraham; R James Brenner; Patricia A Carney; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Diana S M Buist; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.

Authors:  Sara L Jackson; Stephen H Taplin; Edward A Sickles; Linn Abraham; William E Barlow; Patricia A Carney; Berta Geller; Eric A Berns; Gary R Cutter; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  PTEN Loss in E-Cadherin-Deficient Mouse Mammary Epithelial Cells Rescues Apoptosis and Results in Development of Classical Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mirjam C Boelens; Micha Nethe; Sjoerd Klarenbeek; Julian R de Ruiter; Eva Schut; Nicola Bonzanni; Amber L Zeeman; Ellen Wientjens; Eline van der Burg; Lodewyk Wessels; Renée van Amerongen; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 9.423

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.