Literature DB >> 14659132

Preoperative systemic treatment: prediction of responsiveness.

M Colleoni1, D Zahrieh, R D Gelber, G Viale, A Luini, P Veronesi, M Intra, V Galimberti, G Renne, A Goldhirsch, D Zarieh.   

Abstract

The use of predictive factors allows a more effective use of available therapies by enabling clinicians to distinguish patients likely to obtain substantial benefit from treatment from those for whom the same therapy is less likely to be effective. A most relevant aspect of clinical research is thus to develop alternative therapeutic approaches which are more efficacious for this latter group, particularly important since treatment effects are likely to be small. In the preoperative setting several predictors of response were identified. They include: diameter of the lesion (larger lesions respond less than smaller lesions), MIB-1 increased expression associated with increased response to chemotherapy, and estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in the tumor typically associated with increased response to endocrine therapies. Other factors include HER-2/neu overexpression, which is a target for treatment with the humanized monoclonal antibody against its extracellular domain, is hypothesized to increase response to anthracycline combination chemotherapy and to lead to an improved response to some endocrine agents (e.g. letrozole) rather than to others. Although primary endocrine therapy demonstrated activity and low profile of side effects in selected populations of older patients, it is infrequently used. On the other hand, chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment being considered to be a more active and better documented option. Experience at the European Institute of Oncology on 399 patients with large or locally advanced breast cancer (cT2-T4, N0-2, M0) treated with primary chemotherapy, indicated that a proper selection of primary treatment should be based on tumor characteristics such as ER and PgR status. In particular, patients with tumors with no ER and PgR expression (endocrine-unresponsive disease) at the baseline core-biopsy had a significantly higher response rate to chemotherapy if compared with tumors with some ER/PgR expression. In fact, the absence of ER and PgR expression was the strongest predictors of pCR at the multivariate analysis (P<0.0001). Information on endocrine responsiveness before primary systemic therapy will lead to better tailoring of treatment modalities, thus avoiding chemotherapy in selected populations where other approaches (e.g. endocrine primary therapy) might be more useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14659132     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00163-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  8 in total

1.  Mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) identified proteomic biosignatures of breast cancer in proximal fluid.

Authors:  Stephen A Whelan; Jianbo He; Ming Lu; Puneet Souda; Romaine E Saxton; Kym F Faull; Julian P Whitelegge; Helena R Chang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Progesterone Receptors, Pathological Complete Response and Early Outcome for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer - a Single Centre Study. (PPLB - 01).

Authors:  Sanjit Agrawal; Lalit Banswal; Animesh Saha; Indu Arun; Soumitra Shankar Datta; Sanjoy Chatterjee; Rosina Ahmed
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-23

3.  Role of MIB1 in predicting survival in patients with glioblastomas.

Authors:  Shaye I Moskowitz; Tao Jin; Richard A Prayson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Classical and Novel Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer and their Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Pankaj Taneja; Dejan Maglic; Fumitake Kai; Sinan Zhu; Robert D Kendig; Elizabeth A Fry; Kazushi Inoue
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2010-04-20

5.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13

6.  Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry.

Authors:  E C Inwald; M Klinkhammer-Schalke; F Hofstädter; F Zeman; M Koller; M Gerstenhauer; O Ortmann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma: Japanese mono-institutional results.

Authors:  Takahiro Oike; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Ken-ichi Sugawara; Katsuyuki Shirai; Shin-ei Noda; Tomoaki Tamaki; Masaya Nagaishi; Hideaki Yokoo; Yoichi Nakazato; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inhibition of ERα/ERK/P62 cascades induces "autophagic switch" in the estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells exposed to gemcitabine.

Authors:  Peng Shen; Ming Chen; Mengye He; Luoquan Chen; Yinjing Song; Peng Xiao; Xiaopeng Wan; Feng Dai; Ting Pan; Qingqing Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-07-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.