BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compared treatment patterns and costs for patients with recognized and unrecognized bipolar disorder with those of depressed patients without a bipolar disorder claim. METHOD: Claims data for 7 large national employers covering 585,584 persons aged less than 65 years were used to identify patients diagnosed with depression and initially treated with antidepressants. Data on employees, as well as spouses and dependents, for the period 1998 to mid-2001 were used. Patients were identified as bipolar based on the criteria of a bipolar diagnosis claim (ICD-9 codes: 296.0, 296.1, 296.4-296.8) and/or a mood stabilizer prescription claim. Of the patients identified as bipolar, unrecognized bipolar disorder (unrecognized-BP) patients met the criteria after antidepressant initiation, while recognized bipolar disorder (recognized-BP) patients met the criteria at or before initiation. The remaining patients in the sample were non-bipolar depressed (non-BP) patients. Outcome measures included treatment patterns and monthly medical costs in the 12 months subsequent to initiation of antidepressant treatment. RESULTS: Of the 9009 patients treated for depression with antidepressants, there were 8383 non-BP patients (93.1%), 293 recognized-BP patients (3.3%), and 333 unrecognized-BP patients (3.7%). Use of combination therapies varied among the non-BP (11%), unrecognized-BP (32%), and recognized-BP patients (44%) (all pairwise p <.01). Use of mood stabilizers was less frequent among unrecognized-BP patients (14%) than recognized-BP patients (34%) (p <.0001). Unrecognized-BP patients incurred significantly greater (p <.05) mean monthly medical costs ($1179 US dollars) in the 12 months following initiation of antidepressant treatment compared with recognized-BP patients ($801 US dollars) and non-BP patients ($585 US dollars). Monthly indirect costs were significantly greater (p <.05) for unrecognized-BP ($570 US dollars) and recognized-BP ($514 US dollars) employees compared with non-BP employees ($335 US dollars) in the 12 months following antidepressant initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of medication treatment for bipolar disorder were suboptimal. Accurate and timely recognition of bipolar disease was associated with lower medical costs and lower indirect costs due to work loss.
BACKGROUND: This retrospective study compared treatment patterns and costs for patients with recognized and unrecognized bipolar disorder with those of depressedpatients without a bipolar disorder claim. METHOD: Claims data for 7 large national employers covering 585,584 persons aged less than 65 years were used to identify patients diagnosed with depression and initially treated with antidepressants. Data on employees, as well as spouses and dependents, for the period 1998 to mid-2001 were used. Patients were identified as bipolar based on the criteria of a bipolar diagnosis claim (ICD-9 codes: 296.0, 296.1, 296.4-296.8) and/or a mood stabilizer prescription claim. Of the patients identified as bipolar, unrecognized bipolar disorder (unrecognized-BP) patients met the criteria after antidepressant initiation, while recognized bipolar disorder (recognized-BP) patients met the criteria at or before initiation. The remaining patients in the sample were non-bipolar depressed (non-BP) patients. Outcome measures included treatment patterns and monthly medical costs in the 12 months subsequent to initiation of antidepressant treatment. RESULTS: Of the 9009 patients treated for depression with antidepressants, there were 8383 non-BPpatients (93.1%), 293 recognized-BPpatients (3.3%), and 333 unrecognized-BPpatients (3.7%). Use of combination therapies varied among the non-BP (11%), unrecognized-BP (32%), and recognized-BPpatients (44%) (all pairwise p <.01). Use of mood stabilizers was less frequent among unrecognized-BPpatients (14%) than recognized-BPpatients (34%) (p <.0001). Unrecognized-BPpatients incurred significantly greater (p <.05) mean monthly medical costs ($1179 US dollars) in the 12 months following initiation of antidepressant treatment compared with recognized-BPpatients ($801 US dollars) and non-BPpatients ($585 US dollars). Monthly indirect costs were significantly greater (p <.05) for unrecognized-BP ($570 US dollars) and recognized-BP ($514 US dollars) employees compared with non-BP employees ($335 US dollars) in the 12 months following antidepressant initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of medication treatment for bipolar disorder were suboptimal. Accurate and timely recognition of bipolar disease was associated with lower medical costs and lower indirect costs due to work loss.
Authors: Richard A Brook; Krithika Rajagopalan; Nathan L Kleinman; James E Smeeding; Truman J Brizee; Harold H Gardner Journal: Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2006
Authors: Sean H Yutzy; Chad R Woofter; Christopher C Abbott; Imad M Melhem; Brooke S Parish Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Paul Stang; Cathy Frank; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Karen Wells; Steven Burch; Bruce Muma Journal: Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2006
Authors: Kathleen R Merikangas; Hagop S Akiskal; Jules Angst; Paul E Greenberg; Robert M A Hirschfeld; Maria Petukhova; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2007-05