Literature DB >> 14658379

Do Golgi tendon organs really inhibit muscle activity at high force levels to save muscles from injury, and adapt with strength training?

Gordon Chalmers1.   

Abstract

Introductory textbooks commonly state that Golgi tendon organs (GTOs) are responsible for a reflex response that inhibits a muscle producing dangerously high tension (autogenic inhibition). Review of the relevant data from animal studies demonstrates that there is wide variability in the magnitude of, and even the presence of, GTO autogenic effects among locomotor hindlimb muscles, and that data on GTO effects under conditions of voluntary maximal muscle activation are lacking. A single available study on GTO function in humans, during a moderate contraction, surprisingly shows a reduction in autogenic inhibition during muscle-force production. Further, it is not possible to find experimental evidence supporting the idea that strength training may produce a decrease in GTO mediated autogenic inhibition, allowing greater muscle activation levels and hence greater force production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 14658379     DOI: 10.1080/14763140208522800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Biomech        ISSN: 1476-3141            Impact factor:   2.832


  9 in total

Review 1.  Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching : mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Melanie J Sharman; Andrew G Cresswell; Stephan Riek
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Jumper's knee mechanical consequences in professional basketball players: the "Camel's Back curve".

Authors:  Marc Dauty; Pierre Menu; Thomas Garraud; Olivier Mesland; Thibaud Berlivet; Benoit Metayer; Alban Fouasson-Chailloux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Isokinetic Strength and Functional Scores after Rehabilitation in Jiu-Jitsu Fighter with Repair Surgery of Pectoralis Major Muscle Rupture: A Case Report.

Authors:  Guangyi Hu; Quan Jiang; Ji Young Lee; Yong-Hwan Kim; Duk-Han Ko
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30

4.  Increased prefrontal activity and reduced motor cortex activity during imagined eccentric compared to concentric muscle actions.

Authors:  C-J Olsson; M Hedlund; P Sojka; R Lundström; B Lindström
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  Chronic resistance training: is it time to rethink the time course of neural contributions to strength gain?

Authors:  G E P Pearcey; S Alizedah; K E Power; D C Button
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Neck Pain: Do We Know Enough About the Sensorimotor Control System?

Authors:  Ning Qu; HaoChun Tian; Enrico De Martino; Bin Zhang
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Impact of Patellar Tendinopathy on Isokinetic Knee Strength and Jumps in Professional Basketball Players.

Authors:  Marc Dauty; Pierre Menu; Olivier Mesland; Bastien Louguet; Alban Fouasson-Chailloux
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF): Its Mechanisms and Effects on Range of Motion and Muscular Function.

Authors:  Kayla B Hindle; Tyler J Whitcomb; Wyatt O Briggs; Junggi Hong
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  A promising approach to effectively reduce cramp susceptibility in human muscles: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael Behringer; Markus Moser; Molly McCourt; Johannes Montag; Joachim Mester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.