Literature DB >> 1465728

Incision extension is the optimal method of difficult gallbladder extraction at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

B M Bordelon1, K A Hobday, J G Hunter.   

Abstract

An unsolved problem of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the optimal method of removing the gallbladder with thick walls and a large stone burden. Proposed solutions include fascial dilatation, stone crushing, and ultrasonic, high-speed rotary, or laser lithotripsy. Our observation was that extension of the fascial incision to remove the impacted gallbladder was time efficient and did not increase postoperative pain. We reviewed the narcotic requirements of 107 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Fifty-two patients required extension of the umbilical incision, and 55 patients did not have their fascial incision enlarged. Parenteral meperidine use was 39.5 +/- 63.6 mg in the patients requiring fascial incision extension and 66.3 +/- 79.2 mg in those not requiring fascial incision extension (mean +/- standard deviation). Oral narcotic requirements were 1.1 +/- 1.5 doses vs 1.3 +/- 1.7 doses in patients with and without incision extension, respectively. The wide range of narcotic use in both groups makes these apparent differences not statistically significant. We conclude that protracted attempts at stone crushing or expensive stone fragmentation devices are unnecessary for the extraction of a difficult gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1465728     DOI: 10.1007/bf02498808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  J Perissat; D Collet; G Vitale; R Belliard; M Sosso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients.

Authors:  J H Peters; E C Ellison; J T Innes; J L Liss; K E Nichols; J M Lomano; S R Roby; M E Front; L C Carey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K A Zucker; R W Bailey; T R Gadacz; A L Imbembo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  An alternative gallbladder extraction technique in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C N Tang; D C T Wong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Spilled cells, spilled clips, spilled stones. New problems or old challenges.

Authors:  D H Birkett
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The spilled stone. A potential danger after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E M Targarona; C Balagué; A Cifuentes; J Martínez; M Trías
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Specialized endoscopic equipment.

Authors:  J M Sackier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Design, development, and evaluation of a novel retraction device for gallbladder extraction during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Joshua M Judge; George J Stukenborg; William F Johnston; William H Guilford; Craig L Slingluff; Peter T Hallowell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.