Literature DB >> 14656059

Bayesian two-compartment and classic single-compartment minimal models: comparison on insulin modified IVGTT and effect of experiment reduction.

Tiziano Callegari1, Andrea Caumo, Claudio Cobelli.   

Abstract

Models describing plasma glucose and insulin concentration of an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) allow a noninvasive cost-effective approach to estimate important indexes characterizing the efficiency of glucose-insulin control system, i.e., glucose effectiveness (S(G)) and insulin sensitivity (S(I)). To overcome some limitations of the classic single compartment minimal model (1CMM) of glucose kinetics , a two-compartment Bayesian minimal model (2CBMM) has been recently proposed for the standard IVGTT. This study aims to assess 2CBMM ability to describe the insulin-modified IVGTT (IM-IVGTT) which is the protocol of choice since it allows to study insulinopenic states. Both a full-length IM-IVGTT (240 min) as well as a reduced version (90 min) of it are studied. Results of the maximum a posteriori identification of IM-IVGTT (240 min) in 13 normals agree with those of standard IVGTT, i.e., a 42% decrease (P < 0.002) of S(G) and a 13% increase (P < 0.006) of S(I) with respect to ICMM. When identified from IM-IVGTT (90 min), 2CBMM not only provides S(G) and S(I) estimates 46% lower (P < 0.002) and 41% higher (P < 0.002) than 1CMM ones respectively, but also seems to overcome some limitations of the 240 min-based identification that probably arise because the minimal model is unable to properly account for the hyperglycemic hormonal response taking place in the second half of IM-IVGTT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14656059     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2003.819850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of intravenous glucose tolerance test data using parametric and nonparametric modeling: application to a population at risk for diabetes.

Authors:  Vasilis Z Marmarelis; Dae C Shin; Yaping Zhang; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Giovanni Pacini; David Z D'Argenio
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

2.  Design and clinical pilot testing of the model-based dynamic insulin sensitivity and secretion test (DISST).

Authors:  Thomas F Lotz; J Geoffrey Chase; Kirsten A McAuley; Geoffrey M Shaw; Paul D Docherty; Juliet E Berkeley; Sheila M Williams; Christopher E Hann; Jim I Mann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

3.  Diabetes: Models, Signals, and Control.

Authors:  Claudio Cobelli; Chiara Dalla Man; Giovanni Sparacino; Lalo Magni; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Boris P Kovatchev
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-01-01

4.  Nonlinear modeling of the dynamic effects of infused insulin on glucose: comparison of compartmental with Volterra models.

Authors:  Georgios D Mitsis; Mihalis G Markakis; Vasilis Z Marmarelis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Variability in Estimated Modelled Insulin Secretion.

Authors:  Jennifer J Ormsbee; Hannah J Burden; Jennifer L Knopp; J Geoffrey Chase; Rinki Murphy; Peter R Shepherd; Troy Merry
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-15

6.  A discrete Single Delay Model for the Intra-Venous Glucose Tolerance Test.

Authors:  Simona Panunzi; Pasquale Palumbo; Andrea De Gaetano
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.432

Review 7.  Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.