Literature DB >> 14655942

Inverse treatment planning by physically constrained minimization of a biological objective function.

P Stavrev1, D Hristov, B Warkentin, E Sham, N Stavreva, B G Fallone.   

Abstract

In the current state-of-the art of clinical inverse planning, the design of clinically acceptable IMRT plans is predominantly based on the optimization of physical rather than biological objective functions. A major impetus for this trend is the unproven predictive power of radiobiological models, which is largely due to the scarcity of data sets for an accurate evaluation of the model parameters. On the other hand, these models do capture the currently known dose-volume effects in tissue dose-response, which should be accounted for in the process of optimization. In order to incorporate radiobiological information in clinical treatment planning optimization, we propose a hybrid physico-biological approach to inverse treatment planning based on the application of a continuous penalty function method to the constrained minimization of a biological objective. The objective is defined as the weighted sum of normal tissue complication probabilities evaluated with the Lyman normal-tissue complication probability model. Physical constraints specify the admissible minimum and maximum target dose. The continuous penalty function method is then used to find an approximate solution of the resulting large-scale constrained minimization problem. Plans generated by our approach are compared to ones produced by a commercial planning system incorporating physical optimization. The comparisons show clinically negligible differences, with the advantage that the hybrid technique does not require specifications of any dose-volume constraints to the normal tissues. This indicates that the proposed hybrid physico-biological method can be used for the generation of clinically acceptable plans.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14655942     DOI: 10.1118/1.1617411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Adaptive IMRT using a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm integrated with a diffusion-invasion model of glioblastoma.

Authors:  C H Holdsworth; D Corwin; R D Stewart; R Rockne; A D Trister; K R Swanson; M Phillips
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Multimodality functional imaging in radiation therapy planning: relationships between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI, and 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Moisés Mera Iglesias; David Aramburu Núñez; José Luis Del Olmo Claudio; Antonio López Medina; Iago Landesa-Vázquez; Francisco Salvador Gómez; Brandon Driscoll; Catherine Coolens; José L Alba Castro; Victor Muñoz
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  The use of biologically related model (Eclipse) for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning of nasopharyngeal carcinomas.

Authors:  Monica W K Kan; Lucullus H T Leung; Peter K N Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An integrated strategy of biological and physical constraints in biological optimization for cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Ziwei Feng; Cheng Tao; Jian Zhu; Jinhu Chen; Gang Yu; Shaohua Qin; Yong Yin; Dengwang Li
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Prescription Value-Based Automatic Optimization of Importance Factors in Inverse Planning.

Authors:  Caiping Guo; Pengcheng Zhang; Zhiguo Gui; Huazhong Shu; Lihong Zhai; Jinrong Xu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.