Literature DB >> 14655200

Peritoneoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter and bowel perforation: experience of an interventional nephrology program.

Arif Asif1, Patricia Byers, Cristovao F Vieira, Donna Merrill, Florin Gadalean, Jacques J Bourgoignie, Baudouin Leclercq, David Roth, Merit F Gadallah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bowel perforation is an uncommon but serious complication of peritoneoscopic peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion. The approach to diagnosis of bowel perforation utilizing this technique has not been previously published. The authors report their experience with the diagnosis and management of bowel perforation in the context of peritoneoscopic placement of PD catheters.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 750 PD catheters inserted over a 12-year period (January 1991 to May 2003) utilizing peritoneoscopic technique.
RESULTS: Six (0.8%) patients experienced bowel perforation during the procedure. The diagnosis was made immediately during the procedure in 5 (83%) of the 6 patients. Of these 5, peritoneoscopy confirmed intrabowel position of the cannula by visualizing bowel mucosa (n = 3) and hard stool (n = 1). The fifth patient showed extrusion of fecal matter upon trocar withdrawal before peritoneoscopy. All 5 had emanation of foul-smelling gas through the cannula. Bowel rest and broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were initiated. Of the 5, 1 required surgery, whereas the others were discharged home after 3 days. The sixth patient had fever, severe peritoneal irritation, and polymicrobial peritonitis the morning after the procedure. In this patient, no evidence of bowel injury was noted during the procedure except for brief emanation of foul-smelling gas. He required surgical intervention.
CONCLUSION: Bowel perforation can be diagnosed immediately in most patients undergoing peritoneoscopic PD catheter insertion. A majority of these patients can be treated medically. The surgical team should be consulted if the patient shows clinical deterioration or has signs of peritoneal irritation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14655200     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.08.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  6 in total

1.  Percutaneous and surgical peritoneal dialysis catheter placements have comparable outcomes in the modern era.

Authors:  Johann Nicholas; Mark Thomas; Roger Adkins; Kanwaljit Sandhu; Steve Smith; Jonathan Odum; Indranil Dasgupta
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Guidelines for laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis access surgery.

Authors:  Stephen Haggerty; Scott Roth; Danielle Walsh; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Raymond Price; Robert D Fanelli; Todd Penner; William Richardson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Travails of self-manipulation of a catheter.

Authors:  A Mishra; A Elusta; T Shwaish; E F Ehtuish
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comprehensive management of full-thickness luminal defects: The next frontier of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Joshua S Winder; Eric M Pauli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-10

5.  Section 5: Dialysis Interventions for Treatment of AKI.

Authors: 
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)       Date:  2012-03

6.  Jejunal perforation during peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: A case report.

Authors:  Sukit Raksasuk; Woraboot Taweerautchana; Thatsaphan Srithongkul
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.