Literature DB >> 1465483

Diagnostic imaging in cancer.

C G Berman1, R A Clark.   

Abstract

Screening chest radiographs do not reduce mortality from lung cancer. Should an incidental noncalcified pulmonary parenchymal nodule be discovered, chest CT will demonstrate one third of such patients to, in fact, have the multiple nodules of metastatic disease. CT is very helpful to guide fine needle aspiration biopsy of lung lesions and to assist in evaluation for resectability. MR can be helpful in special circumstances, including the definition of the extent of paravertebral, superior sulcus, and diaphragmatic lesions. Endorectal ultrasound is not sensitive enough to function as a screening tool for prostate cancer but is used routinely to guide biopsies. CT and MR are rarely helpful in staging this disease. Given the highly characteristic trait of bone metastasis in prostate cancer, a bone scan is mandatory in all patients. Double contrast barium enema can be used as an adjunct or alternative to sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, in the preoperative evaluation of patients, and in postoperative surveillance. CT and MR can detect macroscopic adenopathy and liver metastases; CT is generally the preferred study. Screening mammography can have a major impact in reducing breast cancer mortality. It is recommended that a baseline study be obtained at age 35. Annual or biannual examinations should commence at age 40. Any palpable lesion, whether or not it is demonstrated mammographically, must be subjected to biopsy. Ultrasound is the most useful initial imaging study for evaluating pelvic masses. MR will, on occasion, identify the origin of a mass not determinable from ultrasound scan. MR is particularly valuable to identify parametrial spread (inoperability) of cervical cancer, and has been underused for this purpose. Surgery remains the mainstay for the staging of ovarian and endometrial cancer, although CT can be helpful to identify macroscopic relapse, ascites, or liver metastases. Bone scan and liver CT remain the standard procedures for detecting metastases in these respective organ systems. MR can be invaluable in the imaging of epidural metastasis and spinal cord compression in patients with vertebral metastatic disease. Contrast-enhanced MR is more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT for detecting brain metastases, but the latter remains a useful tool. Chest CT can improve the detection of pulmonary metastases when this is of crucial importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1465483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Care        ISSN: 0095-4543            Impact factor:   2.907


  6 in total

1.  The value of metastatic screening in early primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Barry; F Thornton; M Murphy; F Younis; R G Watson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Sublingual Nodules: Diagnostic Markers of Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xue Yang; Cui-Hong Zhu; Rui Cao; Jian Hao; Xiong-Zhi Wu
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer based on radiomics signatures extracted from preoperative contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Qingliang Feng; Qiang Hu; Yan Liu; Tao Yang; Ziyi Yin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  MALDI-MS-Based Profiling of Serum Proteome: Detection of Changes Related to Progression of Cancer and Response to Anticancer Treatment.

Authors:  Monika Pietrowska; Piotr Widłak
Journal:  Int J Proteomics       Date:  2012-07-30

5.  Serological diagnosis of liver metastasis in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Rui Cao; Li-Ping Wang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.248

6.  Staging Investigations in Breast Cancer: Collective Opinion of UK Breast Surgeons.

Authors:  N Chand; R I Cutress; R S Oeppen; A Agrawal
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-11-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.