Literature DB >> 14654577

Acceptability of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy without intravenous sedation: patients' versus endoscopist's perception with special reference to older patients.

B R Thanvi1, S K Munshi, N Vijayakumar, N Taub, T C N Lo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unsedated oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) is considered by most endoscopists to be a quick, safe, and well tolerated procedure. Older patients are said to tolerate it better than younger patients. However, patients' perception of the discomfort for the unsedated OGD has not been well studied.
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare (1) patients' perception of discomfort with the endoscopist's perception of patients' discomfort for the unsedated OGD, (2) tolerability between older (> or =75 years) and younger (<75 years) patients. DESIGN AND
SUBJECTS: A total of 130 consecutive patients attending a day case endoscopy unit were recruited for the study. The patients and endoscopist recorded their assessment using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The results were analysed using non-parametric tests. Thirty patients were excluded from the study based on exclusion criteria. Sixty three (57%) patients were aged > or =75 years and 37 (43%) were <75 years.
RESULTS: A significant difference was noted between patients' perception of the discomfort and the endoscopist's assessment of the patient's discomfort as suggested by the overall higher VAS scores for patients (median 4.9, SD 2.6) than those of the endoscopist (median 2.2, SD 1.2), giving a significant difference in median VAS score of 3.4 (p<0.001). Older and younger patients had similar scores, with median (SD) VAS scores of 4.8 (2.5) for > or =75 years and 4.9 (2.8) for <75 years. The endoscopist's median scores for these two groups were 2.2 (1.2) and 2.1 (1.3), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' discomfort during OGD performed without sedation was greatly underestimated by the endoscopist. There was no significant difference in acceptability between old and the young patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14654577      PMCID: PMC1742868          DOI: 10.1136/pmj.79.937.650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  7 in total

Review 1.  Transnasal endoscopy: Technical considerations, advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Mustafa Atar; Abdurrahman Kadayifci
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-02-16

2.  Effective communication enhances the patients' endoscopy experience.

Authors:  D P Toomey; M Hackett-Brennan; G Corrigan; C Singh; G Nessim; P Balfe
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  A self-assessment tool for predicting discomfort and tolerance in Chinese patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Jinqing Ou; Kuiqing Lu; Junzhen Li; Xi Deng; Junhui He; Guijin Luo; Hongdan Mo; Lingli Lu; Man Yang; Jinqiu Yuan; Pingguang Lei
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  The effect of sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Atul Sachdeva; Ashish Bhalla; Ashwani Sood; Ajay Duseja; Vijay Gupta
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

5.  Associations of anxiety with discomfort and tolerance in Chinese patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Man Yang; Ling-Li Lu; Miao Zhao; Jun Liu; Qiu-Lan Li; Qin Li; Peng Xu; Lin Fu; Ling-Min Luo; Jun-Hui He; Wen-Bo Meng; Ping-Guang Lei; Jin-Qiu Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Necessity of transnasal gastroscopy in routine diagnostics: a patient-centred requirement analysis.

Authors:  Anna-Livia Schuldt; Holger Kirsten; Jan Tuennemann; Mario Heindl; Florian van Bommel; Juergen Feisthammel; Marcus Hollenbach; Albrecht Hoffmeister
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04-14

7.  Survey of Anxiety in Ordinary Workers and Doctors Regarding Sedative Use during Endoscopic Examination in the Seoul Metropolitan Area.

Authors:  Yoon-Suk Ra; Chi-Hyo Kim; Youn-Jin Kim; Jong-In Han
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.519

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.