Literature DB >> 14653743

Is a small number of charge neutralizations sufficient to bend nucleosome core DNA onto its superhelical ramp?

Gerald S Manning1.   

Abstract

X-ray diffraction structures of the nucleosome core particle along with a variety of experiments are consistent with the idea that an important source of the free energy holding DNA to the superhelical ramp on the histone octamer surface is obtained from a relatively small amount of electrostatic neutralization of the DNA phosphate charge by positively charged histone groups, especially arginine residues. Here we present a theoretical analysis of a simple model that emphasizes the competition between the high degree of bending of the stiff DNA molecule required for its tight curvature on the histone octamer and the neutralization of the DNA phosphate charge by basic histone residues. Our calculation accounts for the strong influence of condensed counterions on the electrostatic interactions. We find that the minimum amount of free energy required to bend DNA into axial conformity with the superhelical ramp at physiological salt concentration can be provided by a scant 6% neutralization of the phosphate charge, in close correspondence to the stoichiometric neutralization of phosphate charge by the arginine side chain that intrudes into the inward-facing minor groove of each DNA double helical turn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14653743     DOI: 10.1021/ja030320t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  13 in total

1.  Charge state of the globular histone core controls stability of the nucleosome.

Authors:  Andrew T Fenley; David A Adams; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Fast, long-range, reversible conformational fluctuations in nucleosomes revealed by single-pair fluorescence resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Miroslav Tomschik; Haocheng Zheng; Ken van Holde; Jordanka Zlatanova; Sanford H Leuba
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  DNA bending induced by carbocyclic sugar analogs constrained to the north conformation.

Authors:  Alba T Macias; Nilesh K Banavali; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2007 Apr 5-15       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  The persistence length of DNA is reached from the persistence length of its null isomer through an internal electrostatic stretching force.

Authors:  Gerald S Manning
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The energetic contribution of induced electrostatic asymmetry to DNA bending by a site-specific protein.

Authors:  Stephen P Hancock; David A Hiller; John J Perona; Linda Jen-Jacobson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Wrapped-around models for the lac operon complex.

Authors:  Giovanni La Penna; Angelo Perico
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  A bridging water anchors the tethered 5-(3-aminopropyl)-2'-deoxyuridine amine in the DNA major groove proximate to the N+2 C.G base pair: implications for formation of interstrand 5'-GNC-3' cross-links by nitrogen mustards.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Feng Li; Manjori Ganguly; Luis A Marky; Barry Gold; Martin Egli; Michael P Stone
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  The salt dependence of the interferon regulatory factor 1 DNA binding domain binding to DNA reveals ions are localized around protein and DNA.

Authors:  Victoria V Hargreaves; Robert F Schleif
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Cations Regulate Membrane Attachment and Functionality of DNA Nanostructures.

Authors:  Diana Morzy; Roger Rubio-Sánchez; Himanshu Joshi; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Lorenzo Di Michele; Ulrich F Keyser
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  DNA bending by bHLH charge variants.

Authors:  Robert J McDonald; Jason D Kahn; L James Maher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.