Literature DB >> 14653297

Influence of different repair procedures on bond strength of adhesive filling materials to etched enamel in vitro.

Christian Hannig1, Petra Hahn, Patrick-Philipp Thiele, Thomas Attin.   

Abstract

Contamination of etched enamel with repair bond agents during repair of dental restorations may interfere with the bonding of composite to enamel. This study examined the bond strength of adhesive filling materials to etched bovine enamel after pre-treatment with the repair systems Monobond S, Silibond and Co-Jet. The materials Tetric Ceram, Dyract and Definite and their corresponding bonding agents (Syntac Single Comp, Prime & Bond NT, Etch and Prime) were tested in combination with the repair systems. One hundred and thirty-five enamel specimens were etched (37% phosphoric acid, 60 seconds) and equally distributed among three groups (A-C). In Group A, the repair materials were applied on etched enamel followed by applying the composite materials without using their respective bonding material. In Group B, the composite materials were placed on etched enamel after applying the repair materials and bonding agents. In control Group C, the composite materials and bonding agents were applied on etched enamel without using the repair systems. In each sub-group, every composite material was applied on 15 specimens. Samples were stored in artificial saliva for 14 days and thermocycled 1,000 times (5 degrees C/55 degrees C). The shear bond strength of the samples were then determined in a universal testing machine (ISO 10477). Applying Monobond or Silibond followed by the use of its respective bonding agents resulted in a bond strength that was not statistically different from the controls for all filling materials (Group C). The three composites that used Monobond and Silibond without applying the corresponding bonding agent resulted in bond strengths that were significantly lower than the controls. Utilizing the Co-Jet-System drastically reduced the bond strength of composites on etched enamel. Contamination of etched enamel with the repairing bonding agents Monobond and Silibond does not interfere with bond strength if the application of Monobond and Silibond is followed by using its corresponding bonding system of the composites tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14653297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  5 in total

1.  Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength.

Authors:  Andreas Rathke; Yana Tymina; Bernd Haller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Repair Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite after Different Surface and Bonding Treatments.

Authors:  Michael Wendler; Renan Belli; Reinhard Panzer; Daniel Skibbe; Anselm Petschelt; Ulrich Lohbauer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Cleaning and Conditioning of Contaminated Core Build-Up Material before Adhesive Bonding.

Authors:  Karsten Klosa; Walid Shahid; Milda Aleknonytė-Resch; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Orthodontic bonding to silicate ceramics: impact of different pretreatment methods on shear bond strength between ceramic restorations and ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Rebecca Jungbauer; Christian Kirschneck; Christian M Hammer; Peter Proff; Daniel Edelhoff; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Effect of Intermediate Agents and Preheated Composites on Repair Bond Strength of Silorane-Based Composites.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shafiei; Sahar Akbarian; Marzieh Daryadar
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.