Literature DB >> 14653279

Comparison of different DIAGNOdent cut-off limits for in vivo detection of occlusal caries.

Roswitha Heinrich-Weltzien1, J Kühnisch, T Oehme, A Ziehe, L Stösser, F García-Godoy.   

Abstract

This study tested recently recommended cut-off limits for the laser fluorescence based device DIAGNOdent (KaVo) for detection of occlusal caries. Two hundred and forty-eight permanent molars from 94 patients (mean age 19.2 years) of a general dental practice were included. After professional tooth cleaning, the teeth were examined visually and by the laser fluorescence method. The extent of occlusal lesions (gold standard) was determined after minimal operative intervention. Upon fissure opening, 24 teeth had enamel caries and 224 teeth revealed dentin caries, of which 58 and 166, respectively, were up to or beyond half the dentin. The optimal cut-off limits based on the highest kappa-values (0.51 and 0.54) were > 18 for superficial dentinal caries (D3) and > 37 for deep dentinal caries (D4). The comparison with DIAGNOdent cut-offs given by the manufacturer (n = 4) and those based on clinical trials with in vivo validation (n = 4) and in vitro studies with histological validation (n = 3) revealed a considerable variation in performance. Recommended cut-offs between 17 and 21 for superficial dentin lesions were in the same order of magnitude (0.48-0.51). On the D4 level, only the manufacturer's cut-off of > 34 achieved the best performance (0.51). According to the highest kappa-values and the area under the ROC curves (D3: A(z) = 0.903; D4: A(z) = 0.830), the agreement between the extent of validated caries and laser fluorescence value is still unsatisfactory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14653279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  12 in total

1.  In vivo comparison of laser fluorescence measurements with conventional methods for occlusal caries detection.

Authors:  Meryem Toraman Alkurt; Ilkay Peker; Hacer Deniz Arisu; Oya Bala; Bülent Altunkaynak
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Combined validity of DIAGNOdent™ and visual examination for in vitro detection of occlusal caries in primary molars.

Authors:  Katerina Kavvadia; Panagiotis Lagouvardos; Daphne Apostolopoulou
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Diagnostic performance of the universal visual scoring system (UniViSS) on occlusal surfaces.

Authors:  Jan Kühnisch; Katharina Bücher; Volkmar Henschel; Angela Albrecht; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; Ulrich Mansmann; Reinhard Hickel; Roswitha Heinrich-Weltzien
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison between a laser fluorescence device and visual examination in the detection of occlusal caries in children.

Authors:  Chaza Kouchaji
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2012-08-17

5.  Cavity size difference after caries removal by a fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser and by conventional bur treatment.

Authors:  J Eberhard; K Bode; J Hedderich; S Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  In vivo evaluation of laser fluorescence performance using different cut-off limits for occlusal caries detection.

Authors:  Michele Baffi Diniz; Jonas Almeida Rodrigues; Jonas de Almeida Rodrigues; Andréia Bolzan de Paula; Rita de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Patrick A Fee; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-08

Review 8.  Microdentistry with Lasers.

Authors:  G S Prathima; Dinesh Bhadrashetty; S B Umesh Babu; P Disha
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-09

9.  Development, methodology and potential of the new Universal Visual Scoring System (UniViSS) for caries detection and diagnosis.

Authors:  Jan Kühnisch; Inka Goddon; Susanne Berger; Helga Senkel; Katharina Bücher; Thomas Oehme; Reinhard Hickel; Roswitha Heinrich-Weltzien
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Visual or visual-tactile examination to detect and inform the diagnosis of enamel caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Lucy O'Malley; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.