Literature DB >> 1465287

Evaluation of an implantable venous access system in a general oncology population.

C H Barrios1, J E Zuke, B Blaes, J D Hirsch, A P Lyss.   

Abstract

Venous access has been a problem for the practicing oncologist. Previous approaches, such as arteriovenous fistulas, grafts, or percutaneous catheters, have not gained widespread acceptability. We report our experiences with 230 Port-a-Cath devices, a totally implantable venous access system. The catheters were placed in 218 general oncology patients for the administration of chemotherapy. One patient had three catheters placed and 10 patients had two catheters each. Most patients received standard bolus chemotherapy, while 25 patients were treated with continuous ambulatory infusions. The catheters were in place for an average of 271 days (range 2-1,427 days) for a total of 62,330 catheter days, representing the largest published experience with devices of this type in cancer patients. A total of 24 complications occurred in 22 patients. Catheter insertion was associated with four pneumothoraces, two of which required chest tube drainage. Five catheters were removed because of infection. There were 6 cases of venous thrombosis, but none resulted in pulmonary embolism. Other complications were manageable and included catheter occlusion, migration, and extravasation of chemotherapy agents. The Port-a-Cath is safe and is associated with a low rate of complications. Implantable venous access systems represent a significant advantage in the management of oncology patients with poor venous access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1465287     DOI: 10.1159/000227095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  8 in total

1.  Inadvertent port: catheter placement in azygos vein.

Authors:  K Harish; Y C Madhu
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-06

2.  A rare complication of implanted central-venous access devices: catheter fracture and embolization.

Authors:  J M Debets; J A Wils; J T Schlangen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Catheter tip position as a risk factor for thrombosis associated with the use of subcutaneous infusion ports.

Authors:  Jo Caers; Christel Fontaine; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Johan De Mey; Gerrit Ponnet; Chris Oost; Jan Lamote; Jacques De Greve; Benjamin Van Camp; Patrick Lacor
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Effect of port-care frequency on venous port catheter-related complications in cancer patients.

Authors:  Hatice Odabas; Nuriye Yıldırım Ozdemir; Ipek Ziraman; Sercan Aksoy; Huseyin Abali; Berna Oksuzoglu; Metin Isik; Burak Civelek; Dogan Dede; Nurullah Zengin
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Rupture of totally implantable central venous access devices (Intraports) in patients with cancer: report of four cases.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Filippou; Christoforos Tsikkinis; Georgios K Filippou; Athanasios Nissiotis; Spiros Rizos
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-10-19       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Thrombosis as a complication of central venous access in pediatric patients with malignancies: a 5-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Verena Wiegering; Sophie Schmid; Oliver Andres; Clemens Wirth; Armin Wiegering; Thomas Meyer; Beate Winkler; Paul G Schlegel; Matthias Eyrich
Journal:  BMC Hematol       Date:  2014-10-01

7.  Internal jugular vein thrombosis presenting as a painful neck mass due to a spontaneous dislocated subclavian port catheter as long-term complication: a case report.

Authors:  Marcel Binnebösel; Jochen Grommes; Karsten Junge; Sonja Göbner; Volker Schumpelick; Son Truong
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-06-09

8.  Central venous port system associated thromboses: outcome in 3498 implantations and literature review.

Authors:  Martina Schumacher; Roland H Wagner
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2007-09-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.