Literature DB >> 14652869

Bayesian approaches to multiple sources of evidence and uncertainty in complex cost-effectiveness modelling.

David J Spiegelhalter1, Nicola G Best.   

Abstract

Increasingly complex models are being used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of medical interventions. We describe the multiple sources of uncertainty that are relevant to such models, and their relation to either probabilistic or deterministic sensitivity analysis. A Bayesian approach appears natural in this context. We explore how sensitivity analysis to patient heterogeneity and parameter uncertainty can be simultaneously investigated, and illustrate the necessary computation when expected costs and benefits can be calculated in closed form, such as in discrete-time discrete-state Markov models. Information about parameters can either be expressed as a prior distribution, or derived as a posterior distribution given a generalized synthesis of available data in which multiple sources of evidence can be differentially weighted according to their assumed quality. The resulting joint posterior distributions on costs and benefits can then provide inferences on incremental cost-effectiveness, best presented as posterior distributions over net-benefit and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. These ideas are illustrated with a detailed running example concerning the cost-effectiveness of hip prostheses in different age-sex subgroups. All computations are carried out using freely available software for conducting Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14652869     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  49 in total

1.  Incorporating quality of evidence into decision analytic modeling.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Mark S Roberts; Amy C Justice
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  The contrast and convergence of Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches in pharmacoeconomic analysis.

Authors:  Grant H Skrepnek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  A decision-theoretic framework for the application of cost-effectiveness analysis in regulatory processes.

Authors:  Gianluca Baio; Pierluigi Russo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Assessing genetic heterogeneity within bacterial species isolated from gastrointestinal and environmental samples: how many isolates does it take?

Authors:  D Döpfer; W Buist; Y Soyer; M A Munoz; R N Zadoks; L Geue; B Engel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Acknowledging patient heterogeneity in economic evaluation : a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Janneke P C Grutters; Mark Sculpher; Andrew H Briggs; Johan L Severens; Math J Candel; James E Stahl; Dirk De Ruysscher; Albert Boer; Bram L T Ramaekers; Manuela A Joore
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Geographic variation of gallbladder cancer mortality and risk factors in Chile: a population-based ecologic study.

Authors:  Marcelo E Andia; Ann W Hsing; Gabriella Andreotti; Catterina Ferreccio
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Structural and parameter uncertainty in Bayesian cost-effectiveness models.

Authors:  Christopher H Jackson; Linda D Sharples; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.864

8.  Management interventions in dairy herds: exploring within herd uncertainty using an integrated Bayesian model.

Authors:  Martin J Green; Graham F Medley; Andrew J Bradley; William J Browne
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.683

9.  Estimating dementia-free life expectancy for Parkinson's patients using Bayesian inference and microsimulation.

Authors:  Ardo van den Hout; Fiona E Matthews
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; David J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.