Literature DB >> 14652479

Transmissibility of 15-hertz to 35-hertz vibrations to the human hip and lumbar spine: determining the physiologic feasibility of delivering low-level anabolic mechanical stimuli to skeletal regions at greatest risk of fracture because of osteoporosis.

Clinton Rubin1, Malcolm Pope, J Chris Fritton, Marianne Magnusson, Tommy Hansson, Kenneth McLeod.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Experiments were undertaken to determine the degree to which high-frequency (15-35 Hz) ground-based, whole-body vibration are transmitted to the proximal femur and lumbar vertebrae of the standing human.
OBJECTIVES: To establish if extremely low-level (<1 g, where 1 g = earth's gravitational field, or 9.8 ms-2) mechanical stimuli can be efficiently delivered to the axial skeleton of a human. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vibration is most often considered an etiologic factor in low back pain as well as several other musculoskeletal and neurovestibular complications, but recent in vivo experiments in animals indicates that extremely low-level mechanical signals delivered to bone in the frequency range of 15 to 60 Hz can be strongly anabolic. If these mechanical signals can be effectively and noninvasively transmitted in the standing human to reach those sites of the skeleton at greatest risk of osteoporosis, such as the hip and lumbar spine, then vibration could be used as a unique, nonpharmacologic intervention to prevent or reverse bone loss.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under sterile conditions and local anesthesia, transcutaneous pins were placed in the spinous process of L4 and the greater trochanter of the femur of six volunteers. Each subject stood on an oscillating platform and data were collected from accelerometers fixed to the pins while a vibration platform provided sinusoidal loading at discrete frequencies from 15 to 35 Hz, with accelerations ranging up to 1 g(peak-peak).
RESULTS: With the subjects standing erect, transmissibility at the hip exceeded 100% for loading frequencies less than 20 Hz, indicating a resonance. However, at frequencies more than 25 Hz, transmissibility decreased to approximately 80% at the hip and spine. In relaxed stance, transmissibility decreased to 60%. With 20-degree knee flexion, transmissibility was reduced even further to approximately 30%. A phase-lag reached as high as 70 degrees in the hip and spine signals.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that extremely low-level, high-frequency mechanical accelerations are readily transmitted into the lower appendicular and axial skeleton of the standing individual. Considering the anabolic potential of exceedingly low-level mechanical signals in this frequency range, this study represents a key step in the development of a biomechanically based treatment for osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14652479     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000102682.61791.C9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  59 in total

1.  Weight bearing through lower limbs in a standing frame with and without arm support and low-magnitude whole-body vibration in men and women with complete motor paraplegia.

Authors:  Kathie A Bernhardt; Lisa A Beck; Jeffry L Lamb; Kenton R Kaufman; Shreyasee Amin; Lisa-Ann Wuermser
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Whole-body vibration to treat low back pain: fact or fad?

Authors:  Luke Perraton; Zuzana Machotka; Saravana Kumar
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Evidence for an additional effect of whole-body vibration above resistive exercise alone in preventing bone loss during prolonged bed rest.

Authors:  D L Belavý; G Beller; G Armbrecht; F H Perschel; R Fitzner; O Bock; H Börst; C Degner; U Gast; D Felsenberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Acute effects of whole-body vibration on trunk and neck muscle activity in consideration of different vibration loads.

Authors:  Dennis Perchthaler; Simon Hauser; Hans-Christian Heitkamp; Tobias Hein; Stefan Grau
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 5.  Whole body vibration exercise: are vibrations good for you?

Authors:  M Cardinale; J Wakeling
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Novel, high-frequency, low-strain mechanical loading for premenopausal women with low bone mass: early findings.

Authors:  Belinda R Beck; Kyla Kent; Leah Holloway; Robert Marcus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Whole-body Vibration at Thoracic Resonance Induces Sustained Pain and Widespread Cervical Neuroinflammation in the Rat.

Authors:  Martha E Zeeman; Sonia Kartha; Nicolas V Jaumard; Hassam A Baig; Alec M Stablow; Jasmine Lee; Benjamin B Guarino; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The effects of photobiomodulation and low-amplitude high-frequency vibration on bone healing process: a comparative study.

Authors:  M Rajaei Jafarabadi; G Rouhi; G Kaka; S H Sadraie; J Arum
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Whole-body vibration slows the acquisition of fat in mature female rats.

Authors:  G F Maddalozzo; U T Iwaniec; R T Turner; C J Rosen; J J Widrick
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Safety and severity of accelerations delivered from whole body vibration exercise devices to standing adults.

Authors:  Jesse Muir; Douglas P Kiel; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.319

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.