Literature DB >> 14652260

How willing are parents to improve pedestrian safety in their community?

D Bishai1, P Mahoney, S DeFrancesco, B Guyer, A Carlson Gielen.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine how likely parents would be to contribute to strategies to reduce pedestrian injury risks and how much they valued such interventions.
DESIGN: A single referendum willingness to pay survey. Each parent was randomised to respond to one of five requested contributions towards each of the following activities: constructing speed bumps, volunteering as a crossing guard, attending a neighbourhood meeting, or attending a safety workshop.
SETTING: Community survey. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 723 Baltimore parents from four neighbourhoods stratified by income and child pedestrian injury risk. Eligible parents had a child enrolled in one of four elementary schools in Baltimore City in May 2001. MAIN
RESULTS: The more parents were asked to contribute, the less likely they were to do so. Parents were more likely to contribute in neighbourhoods with higher ratings of solidarity. The median willingness to pay money for speed bumps was conservatively estimated at $6.43. The median willingness to contribute time was 2.5 hours for attending workshops, 2.8 hours in community discussion groups, and 30 hours as a volunteer crossing guard.
CONCLUSIONS: Parents place a high value on physical and social interventions to improve child pedestrian safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14652260      PMCID: PMC1732358          DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.12.951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  6 in total

1.  Reducing childhood pedestrian injuries.

Authors:  R A Schieber; M E Vegega
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Willingness to pay for poison control centers.

Authors:  K A Phillips; R K Homan; H S Luft; P H Hiatt; K R Olson; T E Kearney; S E Heard
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Who's prepared for advocacy? Another inverse law.

Authors:  I Roberts
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 4.  Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature.

Authors:  A Diener; B O'Brien; A Gafni
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  The epidemiology and prevention of child pedestrian injury.

Authors:  M Malek; B Guyer; I Lescohier
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1990-08

6.  Preventing child pedestrian injury: pedestrian education or traffic calming?

Authors:  I Roberts; T Ashton; R Dunn; T Lee-Joe
Journal:  Aust J Public Health       Date:  1994-06
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Child pedestrians: the role of parental beliefs and practices in promoting safe walking in urban neighborhoods.

Authors:  Andrea Carlson Gielen; Susan Defrancesco; David Bishai; Patricia Mahoney; Shiu Ho; Bernard Guyer
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Parental willingness to pay for child safety seats in Mashad, Iran.

Authors:  Lida Jarahi; Mojgan Karbakhsh; Arash Rashidian
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.