Literature DB >> 14650798

Building research capacity. An exploratory model of GPs' training needs and barriers to research involvement.

Alison Jones1, Teresa A Burgess, Elizabeth A Farmer, Jeffrey Fuller, Nigel P Stocks, Judy E Taylor, Raechel L Waters.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine general practitioners' research training needs, and the barriers to involvement in research.
METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with 11 GPs in rural and metropolitan South Australia, analysed using a grounded theory approach.
RESULTS: General practitioners' perceptions about their research needs were limited by their own experience and focussed at an individual level. Overlapping needs and barriers emerged, categorised as: 'individual issues' (a lack of research training or experience, concepts and attitudes to research, and research interest) and 'systems issues' (funding arrangements for general practice, access to resources, opportunity for publication and the role of The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners [RACGP]). DISCUSSION: Our data provide an exploratory model that may assist in developing suitable strategies for research capacity building programs. General practitioners perceived both individual and systems solutions to building research capacity, including multifaceted interventions.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14650798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Fam Physician        ISSN: 0300-8495


  8 in total

1.  Understanding Faculty and Trainee Needs Related to Scholarly Activity in a Large, Nonuniversity Graduate Medical Education Program.

Authors:  Davida Becker; Hanna Garth; Rachel Hollander; Felice Klein; Marc Klau
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017-01-06

2.  Research capacity-building for clinicians: understanding how the research facilitator role fosters clinicians' engagement in the research process.

Authors:  Tracy Flenady; Trudy Dwyer; Julie Kahl; Agnieszka Sobolewska; Kerry Reid-Searl; Tania Signal
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ben Fletcher; Adrian Gheorghe; David Moore; Sue Wilson; Sarah Damery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Tools and instruments for needs assessment, monitoring and evaluation of health research capacity development activities at the individual and organizational level: a systematic review.

Authors:  Johanna Huber; Sushil Nepal; Daniel Bauer; Insa Wessels; Martin R Fischer; Claudia Kiessling
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2015-12-21

5.  A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers' perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research.

Authors:  Lisa A Wozniak; Allison Soprovich; Sandra Rees; Steven T Johnson; Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Understanding practice-based research participation: The differing motivations of engaged vs. non-engaged clinicians in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Donna A Messner; Rachael Moloney; Amy H Warriner; Nicole C Wright; Phillip J Foster; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-08-23

7.  The University of Limerick Education and Research Network for General Practice (ULEARN-GP): practice characteristics and general practitioner perspectives.

Authors:  Andrew O'Regan; Peter Hayes; Ray O'Connor; Monica Casey; Pat O'Dwyer; Aidan Culhane; Patrick O'Donnell; Gary Stack; John Cuddihy; Billy O'Connell; Jerry O'Flynn; Walter Cullen; Jane O'Doherty; Maurice O'Connell; Liam Glynn
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 8.  Uncovering the mechanisms of research capacity development in health and social care: a realist synthesis.

Authors:  Jo Cooke; Paolo Gardois; Andrew Booth
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-09-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.