Literature DB >> 14650517

The cost of slowing the spread of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae).

Jefferson H Mayo1, Thomas J Straka, Donna S Leonard.   

Abstract

Beginning in 1992, the Slow The Spread (STS) pilot project was initiated to target gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) spread rate reduction by controlling populations in the transition zone. The project uses intensive monitoring techniques, with pheromone-baited sticky moth traps, to detect low-level populations and target them for eradication. The primary objective of the pilot project was to evaluate the feasibility of using integrated pest management techniques to slow the spread of gypsy moths over a large geographical area. In this study, the cost of STS pilot project activities in 1993-1995 was investigated. A cost accounting system was developed and used as a framework to collect the cost data and to investigate cost patterns and characteristics. Total expenditures of STS activities for 1993-1995 were 7,685.2 million dollars. Per unit cost was 49.67 dollars per trap with the direct cost component being 35.03 dollars per trap. Trapper labor and vehicle expense accounted for approximately 90% of this direct cost. Per unit cost for treatment activities was found to average 27.86 dollars per treated acre. In general, the STS pilot project is labor intensive, specifically the trapping component. From 1993-1995, 59% of total project expenditures were spent on trapping activities, 28% on pesticide treatments, and 13% on data management. A trapper productivity rate regression model is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14650517     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-96.5.1448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  6 in total

1.  Persistence of invading gypsy moth populations in the United States.

Authors:  Stefanie L Whitmire; Patrick C Tobin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Range expansions transition from pulled to pushed waves as growth becomes more cooperative in an experimental microbial population.

Authors:  Saurabh R Gandhi; Eugene Anatoly Yurtsev; Kirill S Korolev; Jeff Gore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Simulation-based evaluation of two insect trapping grids for delimitation surveys.

Authors:  Hui Fang; Barney P Caton; Nicholas C Manoukis; Godshen R Pallipparambil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Effect of Lure Combination on Fruit Fly Surveillance Sensitivity.

Authors:  Lloyd D Stringer; Rajendra Soopaya; Ruth C Butler; Roger I Vargas; Steven K Souder; Andrew J Jessup; Bill Woods; Peter J Cook; David Maxwell Suckling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Approaches for estimating benefits and costs of interventions in plant biosecurity across invasion phases.

Authors:  Melissa J Welsh; James A Turner; Rebecca S Epanchin-Niell; Juan J Monge; Tarek Soliman; Andrew P Robinson; John M Kean; Craig Phillips; Lloyd D Stringer; Jessica Vereijssen; Andrew M Liebhold; Tom Kompas; Michael Ormsby; Eckehard G Brockerhoff
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.105

6.  Optimal invasive species surveillance in the real world: practical advances from research.

Authors:  Frank H Koch; Denys Yemshanov; Robert G Haight; Chris J K MacQuarrie; Ning Liu; Robert Venette; Krista Ryall
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2020-12-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.