Literature DB >> 14649844

Exact inference in the proportional hazard model: possibilities and limitations.

Sven Ove Samuelsen1.   

Abstract

It is suggested that inference under the proportional hazard model can be carried out by programs for exact inference under the logistic regression model. Advantages of such inference is that software is available and that multivariate models can be addressed. The method has been evaluated by means of coverage and power calculations in certain situations. In all situations coverage was above the nominal level, but on the other hand rather conservative. A different type of exact inference is developed under Type II censoring. Inference was then less conservative, however there are limitations with respect to censoring mechanism, multivariate generalizations and software is not available. This method also requires extensive computational power. Performance of large sample Wald, score and likelihood inference was also considered. Large sample methods works remarkably well with small data sets, but inference by score statistics seems to be the best choice. There seems to be some problems with likelihood ratio inference that may originate from how this method works with infinite estimates of the regression parameter. Inference by Wald statistics can be quite conservative with very small data sets.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14649844     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025880618819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  6 in total

1.  Urn sampling and the proportional hazard model.

Authors:  O Davidov; M Zelen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion.

Authors:  S E Vollset
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A comparison of test statistics for assessing the effects of concomitant variables in survival analysis.

Authors:  K L Lee; F E Harrell; H D Tolley; R A Rosati
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The analysis of rates and of survivorship using log-linear models.

Authors:  T R Holford
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Covariate analysis of survival data: a small-sample study of Cox's model.

Authors:  M E Johnson; H D Tolley; M C Bryson; A S Goldman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Birth weight and mortality in childhood in Norway.

Authors:  S O Samuelsen; P Magnus; L S Bakketeig
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Uveal Melanoma Metastatic to the Liver: The Role of Quantitative Volumetric Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in the Assessment of Early Tumor Response after Transarterial Chemoembolization.

Authors:  Rafael Duran; Julius Chapiro; Constantine Frangakis; MingDe Lin; Todd R Schlachter; Rüdiger E Schernthaner; Zhijun Wang; Lynn J Savic; Vania Tacher; Ihab R Kamel; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.243

2.  Risk factors for revision after shoulder arthroplasty: 1,825 shoulder arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Bjørg-Tilde S Fevang; Stein A Lie; Leif I Havelin; Arne Skredderstuen; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.