OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of current estimates of the noncontagiousness of sputum smear-positive respiratory tuberculosis (TB) on treatment. DESIGN: A descriptive analysis of the mycobacteriologic response to treatment. SETTING: A TB inpatient unit of a Canadian hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-two HIV-seronegative patients with moderate to advanced sputum smear-positive respiratory TB were treated with uninterrupted, directly observed, weight-adjusted isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide. Each patient's initial isolate was drug susceptible and each patient's sputum mycobacteriology was systematically followed until 3 consecutive sputum smears were negative on 3 separate days. RESULTS: The time to smear conversion varied remarkably (range, 8 to 115 days; average, 46 days) and was influenced by sputum sampling frequency. Only 3 patients (9.4%) had smear conversions by 14 days and only 8 (25%) had smear conversions by 21 days, the average time it took for drug susceptibility test results to become available. During the first 21 days of treatment, the semiquantitative sputum smear score decreased rapidly and the time to detection of positive cultures doubled. Within the time to smear conversion, virtually all smear-positive specimens (98%) were culture positive and only 34% of the patients had culture conversions (ie, 3 consecutive negative cultures). CONCLUSION: Current estimates of the noncontagiousness of sputum smear-positive respiratory TB on treatment (for 14 days, for 21 days, or until smear conversion) are estimates of relative noncontagiousness. They do not signal absolute noncontagiousness (culture conversion). Semiquantitative smear and time-to-detection data suggest that respiratory isolation beyond 21 days of optimal treatment should be selective.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of current estimates of the noncontagiousness of sputum smear-positive respiratory tuberculosis (TB) on treatment. DESIGN: A descriptive analysis of the mycobacteriologic response to treatment. SETTING: A TB inpatient unit of a Canadian hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-two HIV-seronegative patients with moderate to advanced sputum smear-positive respiratory TB were treated with uninterrupted, directly observed, weight-adjusted isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide. Each patient's initial isolate was drug susceptible and each patient's sputum mycobacteriology was systematically followed until 3 consecutive sputum smears were negative on 3 separate days. RESULTS: The time to smear conversion varied remarkably (range, 8 to 115 days; average, 46 days) and was influenced by sputum sampling frequency. Only 3 patients (9.4%) had smear conversions by 14 days and only 8 (25%) had smear conversions by 21 days, the average time it took for drug susceptibility test results to become available. During the first 21 days of treatment, the semiquantitative sputum smear score decreased rapidly and the time to detection of positive cultures doubled. Within the time to smear conversion, virtually all smear-positive specimens (98%) were culture positive and only 34% of the patients had culture conversions (ie, 3 consecutive negative cultures). CONCLUSION: Current estimates of the noncontagiousness of sputum smear-positive respiratory TB on treatment (for 14 days, for 21 days, or until smear conversion) are estimates of relative noncontagiousness. They do not signal absolute noncontagiousness (culture conversion). Semiquantitative smear and time-to-detection data suggest that respiratory isolation beyond 21 days of optimal treatment should be selective.
Authors: Richard Long; Richard Jones; James Talbot; Irvin Mayers; James Barrie; Michael Hoskinson; Bruce Light Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Vivian Kawai; Giselle Soto; Robert H Gilman; Christian T Bautista; Luz Caviedes; Luz Huaroto; Eduardo Ticona; Jaime Ortiz; Marco Tovar; Victor Chavez; Richard Rodriguez; A Roderick Escombe; Carlton A Evans Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Sean P Fitzwater; Luz Caviedes; Robert H Gilman; Jorge Coronel; Doris LaChira; Cayo Salazar; Juan Carlos Saravia; Krishna Reddy; Jon S Friedland; David A J Moore Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Payam Nahid; Susan E Dorman; Narges Alipanah; Pennan M Barry; Jan L Brozek; Adithya Cattamanchi; Lelia H Chaisson; Richard E Chaisson; Charles L Daley; Malgosia Grzemska; Julie M Higashi; Christine S Ho; Philip C Hopewell; Salmaan A Keshavjee; Christian Lienhardt; Richard Menzies; Cynthia Merrifield; Masahiro Narita; Rick O'Brien; Charles A Peloquin; Ann Raftery; Jussi Saukkonen; H Simon Schaaf; Giovanni Sotgiu; Jeffrey R Starke; Giovanni Battista Migliori; Andrew Vernon Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Diana I Gomez; Caroline S Mullin; Francisco Mora-Guzmán; J Gonzalo Crespo-Solis; Susan P Fisher-Hoch; Joseph B McCormick; Blanca I Restrepo Journal: Tuberculosis (Edinb) Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 2.973
Authors: Hyun Oh Park; Sung Hwan Kim; Seong Ho Moon; Joung Hun Byun; Jong Woo Kim; Chung Eun Lee; Jong Duk Kim; In Seok Jang; Jun Ho Yang Journal: Infect Chemother Date: 2016-11-21
Authors: Tumaini J Nagu; Donna Spiegelman; Ellen Hertzmark; Said Aboud; Julie Makani; Mecky I Matee; Wafaie Fawzi; Ferdinand Mugusi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 3.240