Literature DB >> 14648895

Quantifying nitrate retention processes in a riparian buffer zone using the natural abundance of 15N in NO3-.

Karel Dhondt1, Pascal Boeckx, Oswald Van Cleemput, Georges Hofman.   

Abstract

Quantifying the relative importance of denitrification and plant uptake to groundwater nitrate retention in riparian zones may lead to methods optimising the construction of riparian zones for water pollution control. The natural abundance of 15N in NO3- has been shown to be an interesting tool for providing insights into the NO3- retention processes occurring in riparian zones. In this study, 15N isotope fractionation (variation in delta15N of the residual NO3-) due to denitrification and due to plant uptake was measured in anaerobic soil slurries at different temperatures (5, 10 and 15 degrees C) and in hydroponic systems with different plant species (Lolium perenne L., Urtica dioica L. and Epilobium hirsutum L.). It was found that temperature had no significant effect on isotope fractionation during denitrification, which resulted in a 15N enrichment factor epsilonD of -22.5 +/- 0.6 per thousand. On the other hand, nitrate uptake by plants resulted in 15N isotope fractionation, but was independent of plant species, leading to a 15N enrichment factor epsilonP of -4.4 +/- 0.3 per thousand. By relating these two laboratory-defined enrichment factors to a field enrichment factor for groundwater nitrate retention during the growing season (epsilonR = -15.5 +/- 1.0 per thousand ), the contribution of denitrification and plant uptake to groundwater nitrate retention could be calculated. The relative importance of denitrification and plant uptake to groundwater nitrate retention in the riparian buffer zone was 49 and 51% during spring, 53 and 47% during summer, and 75 and 25% during autumn. During wintertime, high micropore dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and low redox potentials due to decomposition of the highly productive riparian vegetation probably resulted in a higher denitrification rate and favoured other nitrate retention processes such as nitrate immobilisation or dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA). This could have biased the 15N isotope fractionation and led to a low 15N enrichment factor for groundwater nitrate retention during wintertime (-6.2 +/- 0.9 per thousand ). In contradiction to what many other studies suggest, it is possible that due to plant decomposition during the winter period other nitrate transformation processes compete with denitrification. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 14648895     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of temporal and spatial variation of nitrate removal in riparian zones.

Authors:  Karel Dhondt; Pascal Boeckx; Niko E C Verhoest; Georges Hofman; Oswald Van Cleemput
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Monitoring the Impact of Hedgerows and Grass Strips on the Performance of Multiple Ecosystem Service Indicators.

Authors:  Laura Van Vooren; Bert Reubens; Evy Ampoorter; Steven Broekx; Paul Pardon; Chris Van Waes; Kris Verheyen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Phytodepuration of Nitrate Contaminated Water Using Four Different Tree Species.

Authors:  Luca Regni; Maria Luce Bartucca; Euro Pannacci; Francesco Tei; Daniele Del Buono; Primo Proietti
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.