Literature DB >> 14648819

Cochlear implants in young children.

John K Niparko1, Rebecca Blankenhorn.   

Abstract

The cochlear implant is best characterized as a device that provides access to the sound environment. The device enables the hearing pathway to respond to environmental and speech sounds, providing informational cues from the surroundings and from others that may escape visual detection. As the developmental effects of a profound hearing loss are multiple, cochlear implants have been applied to ever younger children in an attempt to promote a more normal level of developmental learning through audition. In deafness, transducer elements of the inner ear fail to trigger auditory nerve afferent nerves in the presence of sound input. However, large reserves of afferent fibers exist even in the auditory nerve of a profoundly deaf patient. Furthermore, these nerve fibers retain the ability to respond to prosthetic activation. Through developmental learning in the early, formative years, auditory centers of the brain appear capable of processing information from the implant to provide speech comprehension and oral language development. Multichannel implants have replaced original single channel designs. multichannel devices enable larger percentages of recipients to recognize the spoken word without visual cues because they provide spectral information in addition to temporal and intensity cues. Testing under conditions of auditory (implant)-only input reveals significant open-set speech understanding capabilities in more than 75% of children after three years of device use. The benefit provided by implants may vary with a number of conditions including: hearing history, age of deafness onset, age at implantation, etiology of deafness, linguistic abilities, and the presence of a motivated system of support of oral language development. Patient variables should be given individual consideration in judging candidacy for a cochlear implant and in planning rehabilitative and education services after surgery and activation of the device. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14648819     DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.10089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev        ISSN: 1080-4013


  4 in total

1.  Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age.

Authors:  Johanna Grant Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Minimally invasive pocket technique for the implantation of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant.

Authors:  Martine Vanlommel; Samuel Lipski; Pierre Dolhen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Technical devices for hearing-impaired individuals: cochlear implants and brain stem implants - developments of the last decade.

Authors:  Joachim Müller
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

4.  Contribution of auditory working memory to speech understanding in mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Duoduo Tao; Rui Deng; Ye Jiang; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Bing Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.