Literature DB >> 14648818

Early intervention after universal neonatal hearing screening: impact on outcomes.

Christine Yoshinaga-Itano1.   

Abstract

This article summarizes the developmental outcomes of Colorado children with significant hearing loss. Some of the research compares children born in hospitals that have implemented universal newborn hearing screening programs for newborns. Other research compares the developmental outcomes of children who have been early-identified with hearing loss. Early-identification is defined as identification of hearing loss within the first six months of life. Late identification in the Colorado studies is defined as age of identification of hearing loss after the age of six months. In a few of the Colorado studies, age at initiation of intervention was used. Within the Colorado system, age of identification can be interpreted as almost synonymous with age of intervention, as the vast majority of children enter intervention services with two months after the identification of the hearing loss. Children who were early-identified and had early initiation of intervention services (within the first year of life) had significantly better vocabulary, general language abilities, speech intelligibility and phoneme repertoires, syntax as measured by mean length of utterance, social-emotional development, parental bonding, and parental grief resolution. Two other studies (Nebraska and Washington state) of early- versus later-initiation of intervention services report findings similar to the Colorado studies. Direct comparisons with the historical literature are not possible because the developmental delays of what would now be termed "later-identified" were too low to report developmental ages for the birth through five-year-old population. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14648818     DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.10088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev        ISSN: 1080-4013


  32 in total

1.  Determining the effect of newborn hearing screening legislation: an analysis of state hearing screening rates.

Authors:  Denise R Green; Marcus Gaffney; Owen Devine; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Impact of co-occurring birth defects on the timing of newborn hearing screening and diagnosis.

Authors:  Derek A Chapman; Caroline C Stampfel; Joann N Bodurtha; Kelley M Dodson; Arti Pandya; Kathleen B Lynch; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 3.  Cochlear implantation in the very young child: issues unique to the under-1 population.

Authors:  Maura Cosetti; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-03

4.  Automated Vocal Analysis of Children With Hearing Loss and Their Typical and Atypical Peers.

Authors:  Mark VanDam; D Kimbrough Oller; Sophie E Ambrose; Sharmistha Gray; Jeffrey A Richards; Dongxin Xu; Jill Gilkerson; Noah H Silbert; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Diagnosis of and screening for cytomegalovirus infection in pregnant women.

Authors:  S C Munro; B Hall; L R Whybin; L Leader; P Robertson; G T Maine; W D Rawlinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Meeting the challenge: using policy to improve children's health.

Authors:  Charles Adam Brush; Maggie M Kelly; Denise Green; Marcus Gaffney; John Kattwinkel; Molly French
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Development and plasticity of intra- and intersensory information processing.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Andrea R Hillock; Christopher Spankovich; Maria V Popescu; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Using benefit-cost ratio to select Universal Newborn Hearing Screening test criteria.

Authors:  Heather L Porter; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Expected test scores for preschoolers with a cochlear implant who use spoken language.

Authors:  Johanna G Nicholas; Ann E Geers
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Psychosocial development of 5-year-old children with hearing loss: Risks and protective factors.

Authors:  Cara L Wong; Teresa Y Ching; Greg Leigh; Linda Cupples; Laura Button; Vivienne Marnane; Jessica Whitfield; Miriam Gunnourie; Louise Martin
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.