Literature DB >> 14647933

[The Oldenburg children's rhyme test during speech simulating noise disturbance (Regensburg variant). Modification of the test and normal values for the ages 7-10 years].

T Steffens1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Of the German language speech audiometry tests used for children, only the Oldenburg children's rhyme test is constructed to allow measurements in noise. Unfortunately, no reference values exist for such measurements. Many of children admitted to test speech discrimination in noise are suspected of suffering from central auditory processing disorders and/or attention deficits. Thus, the objective of the present study is the development of a speech-in-noise test that focuses the children's attention on the target words.
DESIGN: A speech-simulating noise was added to the Oldenburg children's rhyme test and the discrimination function was estimated. First, the total power of all target words was equalised and the total power of the noise adjusted to obtain a constant signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for all target words. Second, speech and noise were presented binaurally with headphones. Speech was presented at 65 dB SPL and the noise level varied to obtain SNRs of 0, -5 and -10 dB SN. A total of 55 normal children, 7-10 years of age, were also tested.
RESULTS: Mean speech discrimination was 91+/-7% at 0 dB SN, 75+/-11% at -5 dB SN and 55+/-14% at -10 dB SN. The discrimination function results in a speech reception threshold (SRT) of -10.9 dB SN and a maximum slope of 4.95%/dB SN.
CONCLUSION: The "Regensburg" variation of the "Oldenburg children's rhyme test" was easily feasible in all tested children. The results can be used as normative data for children between 7 and 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14647933     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-003-0848-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  7 in total

1.  ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology.

Authors:  W A Dreschler; H Verschuure; C Ludvigsen; S Westermann
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Word recognition performance in various background competitors.

Authors:  J L Sperry; T L Wiley; M R Chial
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  [The Mainz audiometric speech test for children (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Biesalski; H Leitner; E Leitner; D Gangel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds.

Authors:  R Carhart; T W Tillman; E S Greetis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble.

Authors:  M Fallon; S E Trehub; B A Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  [The Göttingen audiometric speech test for children. I. Speech audiometry of the young and retarded child by a picture-test (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Chilla; P Gabriel; P Kozielski; D Bänsch; M Kabas
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  [The Göttingen audiometric speech test for children. II. Speech audiometry of the pre-school child with a monosyllabic picture-test (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Gabriel; R Chilla; C Kiese; M Kabas; D Bänsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.284

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Evaluation of the Oldenburg children's rhyme test in silence and in noise].

Authors:  K C Wagener; T Brand; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [The systematic selection of speech audiometric procedures].

Authors:  T Steffens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.