Literature DB >> 14645889

The measurement of active errors: methodological issues.

R J Lilford1, M A Mohammed, D Braunholtz, T P Hofer.   

Abstract

The value of research in any topic area turns on its validity. Patient safety research has revealed--or, at least, given renewed urgency to--a raft of methodological issues. The meaning and thus the value of empirical research in this field is contingent on getting the methodology right. The need for good methods for the measurement of error is necessary whenever an inference is intended and, since inferences lie at the heart of research and management, there is a huge need to understand better how to make measurements that are meaningful, precise, and accurate. In this paper we consider issues relating to the measurement of error and the need for more research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645889      PMCID: PMC1765778          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  20 in total

1.  An evaluation of adverse incident reporting.

Authors:  N Stanhope; M Crowley-Murphy; C Vincent; A M O'Connor; S E Taylor-Adams
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality.

Authors:  T P Hofer; S J Bernstein; S DeMonner; R A Hayward
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  What is a prescribing error?

Authors:  B Dean; N Barber; M Schachter
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

4.  Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care.

Authors:  J Mant
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates.

Authors:  Eric J Thomas; Stuart R Lipsitz; David M Studdert; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  What is an error?

Authors:  T P Hofer; E A Kerr; R A Hayward
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

7.  Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer.

Authors:  R A Hayward; T P Hofer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The Leeds University Maternity Audit Project.

Authors:  B Wilson; J G Thornton; J Hewison; R J Lilford; I Watt; D Braunholtz; M Robinson
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.038

9.  Using standardized patients to measure professional performance of physicians.

Authors:  Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Michèle Rivard; Eveline Hudon; Danielle Saucier; Martine Remondin; Robert Favreau
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  Validation and application of an instrument for measuring patient relatives' perception of quality of geriatric care.

Authors:  Henna Verho; Judith E Arnetz
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.038

View more
  31 in total

1.  Active surveillance using electronic triggers to detect adverse events in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  M K Szekendi; C Sullivan; A Bobb; J Feinglass; D Rooney; C Barnard; G A Noskin
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

2.  Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice.

Authors:  Richard J Lilford; Celia A Brown; Jon Nicholl
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-29

3.  Commentary on Sharek: adverse events and errors-important to differentiate and difficult to measure.

Authors:  Timothy P Hofer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Creating high reliability in health care organizations.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; Sean M Berenholtz; Christine A Goeschel; Dale M Needham; J Bryan Sexton; David A Thompson; Lisa H Lubomski; Jill A Marsteller; Martin A Makary; Elizabeth Hunt
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  A Guerilla Guide to Common Problems in 'Neurostatistics': Essential Statistical Topics in Neuroscience.

Authors:  Paul F Smith
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2017-11-15

6.  Do clinical trials improve quality of care? A comparison of clinical processes and outcomes in patients in a clinical trial and similar patients outside a trial where both groups are managed according to a strict protocol.

Authors:  J West; J Wright; D Tuffnell; D Jankowicz; R West
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-06

7.  Simulation based teamwork training for emergency department staff: does it improve clinical team performance when added to an existing didactic teamwork curriculum?

Authors:  M J Shapiro; J C Morey; S D Small; V Langford; C J Kaylor; L Jagminas; S Suner; M L Salisbury; R Simon; G D Jay
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12

8.  An investigation into general practitioners associated with high patient mortality flagged up through the Shipman inquiry: retrospective analysis of routine data.

Authors:  Mohammed A Mohammed; Anthony Rathbone; Paulette Myers; Divya Patel; Helen Onions; Andrew Stevens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

9.  French national survey of inpatient adverse events prospectively assessed with ward staff.

Authors:  Philippe Michel; Jean Luc Quenon; Ahmed Djihoud; Sophie Tricaud-Vialle; Anne Marie de Sarasqueta
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-10

10.  Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust.

Authors:  Richard James Lilford; Jo Foster; Mike Pringle
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.