OBJECTIVE: This report evaluates the effects of a depression relapse prevention program on disability outcomes among patients treated for depression at high risk for relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment for depression were assessed 6 to 8 weeks after the initial prescription. Patients responding to initial treatment but at high risk for relapse were randomized to usual care or a relapse prevention intervention (N= 386). The 12-month relapse prevention program included systematic patient education, two psycho-educational visits with a depression prevention specialist, shared decision-making regarding maintenance pharmacotherapy, and ongoing monitoring of medication adherence and depressive symptoms via telephone and mail. Disability outcomes were assessed via blinded telephone assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using SF-36 and Sheehan Disability scales. RESULTS:Usual care patients and relapse prevention program patients had high rates of use of maintenance pharmacotherapy. Both relapse prevention and usual care patients showed improved functioning over the 12-month follow-up period. One of the three disability measures (the SF-36 Social Function scale) showed a significant intervention effect because of continuing improvement at 9 and 12 month follow-up, whereas the Sheehan Disability Scale showed a nonsignificant trend toward greater improvements in disability among relapse prevention patients than among usual care controls. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate effects of a relapse prevention intervention on depressive symptoms were associated with modest and variable effects on disability outcomes. Inconsistent effects of the intervention for disability outcomes may be because of the high rates of maintenance pharmacotherapy among usual care patients, relatively mild levels of depressive symptoms among both intervention and control patients at baseline, the absence of a specific relapse prevention effect of the intervention, and the resultant modest differences in depressive symptoms between intervention and control patients in this trial.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This report evaluates the effects of a depression relapse prevention program on disability outcomes among patients treated for depression at high risk for relapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment for depression were assessed 6 to 8 weeks after the initial prescription. Patients responding to initial treatment but at high risk for relapse were randomized to usual care or a relapse prevention intervention (N= 386). The 12-month relapse prevention program included systematic patient education, two psycho-educational visits with a depression prevention specialist, shared decision-making regarding maintenance pharmacotherapy, and ongoing monitoring of medication adherence and depressive symptoms via telephone and mail. Disability outcomes were assessed via blinded telephone assessments at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using SF-36 and Sheehan Disability scales. RESULTS: Usual care patients and relapse prevention program patients had high rates of use of maintenance pharmacotherapy. Both relapse prevention and usual care patients showed improved functioning over the 12-month follow-up period. One of the three disability measures (the SF-36 Social Function scale) showed a significant intervention effect because of continuing improvement at 9 and 12 month follow-up, whereas the Sheehan Disability Scale showed a nonsignificant trend toward greater improvements in disability among relapse prevention patients than among usual care controls. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate effects of a relapse prevention intervention on depressive symptoms were associated with modest and variable effects on disability outcomes. Inconsistent effects of the intervention for disability outcomes may be because of the high rates of maintenance pharmacotherapy among usual care patients, relatively mild levels of depressive symptoms among both intervention and control patients at baseline, the absence of a specific relapse prevention effect of the intervention, and the resultant modest differences in depressive symptoms between intervention and control patients in this trial.
Authors: Sandra R Wilson; Peg Strub; A Sonia Buist; Sarah B Knowles; Philip W Lavori; Jodi Lapidus; William M Vollmer Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Bradley D Stein; Jane N Kogan; Mark J Mihalyo; James Schuster; Patricia E Deegan; Mark J Sorbero; Robert E Drake Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2012-07-27
Authors: Janet Maurer; Venkata Rebbapragada; Soo Borson; Roger Goldstein; Mark E Kunik; Abebaw M Yohannes; Nicola A Hanania Journal: Chest Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 9.410