Literature DB >> 14645353

Inequalities of primary care microbiology testing between hospital catchment areas.

W S A Smellie1, G Clark, C A M McNulty.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare differences in microbiology testing activity between general practices within and between five hospitals in two National Health Service (NHS) regions in England.
METHODS: Retrospective capture of standardised microbiology testing activity from the laboratory computer databases. Six equivalent tests were identified and compared. Data were obtained for 174 general practices in eight primary care groups, served by two NHS hospital trusts and three public health laboratories. The total catchment population was 1,180,000 people. Comparative test activities were displayed graphically and differences in median test activity and the hospital activity distributions were examined by the Wilcoxon signed rank test.
RESULTS: Median testing activity differed by 200% (urine) to 800% (wound swabs) between the trusts that performed the highest and the lowest number of tests, and from 300% to 1900% between the top and bottom 10% activity bands of general practices. Large and significant differences were found between the hospitals, irrespective of whether they belonged to the same trust, and irrespective of their geographical location.
CONCLUSIONS: Large differences in microbiology testing exist within individual trust catchment areas in primary care, and there are also considerable differences between trusts. These inequalities may also introduce a selection bias into epidemiological and antibiotic resistance surveillance. This indicates a widespread need to examine and deal with the reasons responsible for these differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645353      PMCID: PMC1770142          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.56.12.933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  12 in total

Review 1.  Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Rational, cost effective use of investigations in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ron Winkens; Geert-Jan Dinant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

Review 2.  Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last?

Authors:  G Gopal Rao; M Crook; M L Tillyer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Rational, cost effective use of investigations. Primary care organisations must take charge of laboratory expenditure.

Authors:  Laurence A Malcolm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-27

4.  Rational, cost effective use of investigations. Rising workload and costs in diagnostic departments must be contained.

Authors:  Sudha Bulusu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-27

5.  Rational, cost effective use of investigations. Article gave unbalanced view of overuse of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Patrick H Dessein; Anne E Stanwix
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-27

6.  Effect of population-based interventions on laboratory utilization: a time-series analysis.

Authors:  C van Walraven; V Goel; B Chan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-12-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  What can PACT tell us about prescribing in general practice?

Authors:  A Majeed; N Evans; P Head
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-12-06

8.  Is clinical practice variability the major reason for differences in pathology requesting patterns in general practice?

Authors:  W S A Smellie; M J Galloway; D Chinn; P Gedling
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Management of urinary tract infection in general practice: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  E A Fenwick; A H Briggs; C I Hawke
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  General practitioner referrals to hospital: the financial implications of variability.

Authors:  D L Crombie; D M Fleming
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1988-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Can routine laboratory data guide empirical prescribing?

Authors:  H Ludlam; O Sule; M Knapton; I Abubakar
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Burden of community-onset bloodstream infection: a population-based assessment.

Authors:  K B Laupland; D B Gregson; W W Flemons; D Hawkins; T Ross; D L Church
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Population-based laboratory surveillance for Serratia species isolates in a large Canadian health region.

Authors:  K B Laupland; M D Parkins; D B Gregson; D L Church; T Ross; J D D Pitout
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Temporal growth and geographic variation in the use of laboratory tests by NHS general practices: using routine data to identify research priorities.

Authors:  John Busby; Knut Schroeder; Wolfram Woltersdorf; Jonathan A C Sterne; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Alastair Hay; William Hollingworth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  The state of play in the battle against antimicrobial resistance: a general practitioner perspective.

Authors:  Douglas M Fleming
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Frequencies and patterns of microbiology test requests from primary care in Oxfordshire, UK, 2008-2018: a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records to inform point-of-care testing.

Authors:  J M Ordóñez-Mena; Thomas R Fanshawe; Dona Foster; Monique Andersson; Sarah Oakley; Nicole Stoesser; A Sarah Walker; Gail Hayward
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Towards Better Test Utilization - Strategies to Improve Physician Ordering and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle B Freedman
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2015-01-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.